High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Avtar Singh vs State Of Punjab & Another on 20 October, 2008

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Avtar Singh vs State Of Punjab & Another on 20 October, 2008
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH



                          Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-22162 of 2008
                                       Date of Decision: October 20, 2008


Avtar Singh
                                                            .....PETITIONER(S)

                                      VERSUS


State of Punjab & Another
                                                          .....RESPONDENT(S)
                                  .     .      .


CORAM:            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA


PRESENT: -        None for the petitioner.

                  Mr. Kamaldeep Singh Sidhu,                   Deputy
                  Advocate General, Punjab.

                  Mr. G.C. Rattan,                 Advocate,       for
                  respondent No.2.


                                  .     .      .

AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)

                   This        petition       has    been        filed     under

Section     482    Cr.P.C.       for     quashing        FIR    No.101     dated

30.8.2007       (Annexure       P-1)        lodged   for       commission     of

offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 468 471,

120-B IPC, Police Station, Chamkaur Sahib, District

Ropar.

In Para 2 of the petition, it has been

pleaded that with the intervention of the respectable

of the village, a compromise has been arrived at

between the parties and all the disputes have been

resolved, and the complainant has no grievance or
Crl. Misc. No. M-22162 of 2008 [2]

grouse against the petitioner. Compromise deed has been

placed on record as Annexure P-2.

Learned counsel for respondent No.2-

complainant has disputed the material facts. Learned

counsel contends that the terms of compromise have not

been complied with or abided by the petitioner, and

therefore, the matter cannot be disposed of in view of

compromise.

In view of the stand of learned counsel

for respondent No.2-complainant, the petition is

dismissed.



                                                       (AJAI LAMBA)
October 20, 2008                                          JUDGE
avin