High Court Kerala High Court

Ayshamma Ashraf vs Greater Cochin Development … on 18 January, 2010

Kerala High Court
Ayshamma Ashraf vs Greater Cochin Development … on 18 January, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 23522 of 2008(A)


1. AYSHAMMA ASHRAF, 44 YEARS
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
                       ...       Respondent

2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM.

3. SECRETARY TO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,

4. TAHSILDAR, ALUVA

5. VILLAGE OFFICER, ALUVA(WEST), ALUVA.

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.)

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, SC,GCDA

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :18/01/2010

 O R D E R
                T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                  W.P.(C). No.23522/2008-A
                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
           Dated this the 18th day of January, 2010

                      J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has filed this writ petition aggrieved

by the delay in getting mutation in her name in respect of

12.850 cents in plot No.68 comprised in Survey Nos.305/I-A

and 317/B Aluva West Village. The Greater Cochin

Development Authority invited tenders from the members of

the public for sale of house plots developed by it on the

banks of Periyar river and the petitioner is an allottee of

the plot in question. By Ext.P6 representation, the

petitioner brought to the notice of the G.C.D.A the

necessity for effecting mutation.

2. The learned Standing Counsel for the G.C.D.A

brought to my notice a letter dated 09/11/2009 to the

effect that as per G.O.(MS).No.260/2009/Revenue dated

07/07/2009, the Government has assigned 1.8942 Hectare of

puramboke land in favour of G.C.D.A. The said portion of

the land is involved in Thottakkattukara Scheme. The

learned Standing Counsel submits that in that view of the

matter, the petitioner can approach the Village Officer

concerned for getting mutation. The Enhanced Land Cost

[E.L.C] may also be directed to be remitted by the

petitioner to the G.C.D.A.

W.P.(C). No.23522/2008
-:2:-

3. There will be a direction to the fifth respondent

to consider the application for mutation and take

appropriate action enjoined under law within a period of

two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this

Judgment. If any further amount is payable by the

petitioner towards the enhanced cost of land, the same will

also be remitted by the petitioner to the G.C.D.A.

The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

(T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)

ms