-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY,"
BEFORE
THE I-ION'BLE MR. JUSTICE " " V
WRIT PETITION N0. 8167 OEEOO7
BETWEEN:
B.K.CHANDRASHEKAR sAOAR____'-.__ --
AGED ABOUT 49 . " *
S/O LATE K.R.KENcmxP.PA 1
WORKING As ASSISTANT I<'RO'F'ESSQ.R'--
DEPARTMENT OF NEURO.pAT'H.OEOO"{
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF Mf¢;:NTAL"_j».. A '
Hl33AL'}§'I-I ANDNEBRO .S'C1ENcEs V '
BANGALORE' »--i'_56'e-61,29.'-..,;«--._"~~. " ' PETITIONER
[BY SRT. A1")'\./_H.T)W
AND: V I T T
1. KIDWAI MEMOR,1Ai;_1N'sT1TUTE OF ONCOLOGY
HQSUR ROAD, 'EANOALORE 550 029
REPROEEENTEE' ITS DIRECTOR
':2.{' STA'1'.EA'OvP'v fQA.RNATAr<A
. BY 1"i-'vS"~SECTRIEiTARY To GOVERNMENT
U1NTTHE'DE1FTARTMENT OF' HEALTH AND
E.AM1_EY -WELFARE. VIDHANA SOUDHA
BANGALORE A 550 001. RESPONDENTS
JBYOERI. “M.v.sEsHAcHALA. ADV. FOR R1:
_ ‘ * –..sA/IT. M.C.NAGASHREE, OA FOR R2)
THIS WP IS FILEII) UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
“CONSTITUTION OF’ INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
_g_
ORDERS DT.21.06.2002 VIDIE A.NE\lEX–K. AND DATED
20.9.2006 VIDE ANNEXQ. BOTII ISSUED BY RI”-AND
DIRECT THE RI TO MAKE OVER ITS LIABILITY”»._F’QR
PRO~RATA PENSION AND GRATUITY FOR Tim11:;_4s:sRiv–1_e.EsV.
RENDERED BY THE PIEZTITIONER AND E3’I’C.
THIS PE’I’I’I’iON COEVIING ON FOR~~~§?«F§:E.IiIl’¥l:Il’JA1?§(l »
rfiyeuwcIN*3’GROUP.THE;nAYeeH;couRTNugn9rHe,
FOLLOWING I A’ p
ORDERCT
According to the I the
respondent, the petitioner as Assistant
Research Scientist W Kidwai
Memorial “inst.itute”.
applied tor employment in
Natlorial Health and Neuro Sciences
[‘NIMHAi\ISi_’.fo1f when selected. submitted his
resvigfaaavtieti \NhlC’I’h_._Vif’&S accepted and on being relieved
the services of NIMHANS. The
rejection .’the petitioners representation to the
s_pInstitute}_to discharge its liability for pr0–rata pension
A V~lIf’and”g.rat11ity by paying onetime payment to NIMHANS
I and count the services rendered by the petitioner in the
I/”K
inst.itui:e for pensionary benefits. has resulted. in this
petition.
2. Learned Counsel for the respondezjit.vsubrnitsi V’
that the transfer of personnel;iiibetweeeii .;t,he«._Ceirtra1′.
Government / Autonomous ‘V__b’oc_iies ” b3tateV*..
Government. / Aut’.o1’1omous”b’o:t;iies and_V_V’ie.Ve= does
not apply to the petitioner
was selected in a The
recruitment “‘t’r:a’risfe.rV}iabsorption, the
rejection ofthe_.peti’ti~one’r7s; ‘cram to count his services
rendered 2111 for pensionary benefits by
paying eertain_rnVonies”‘to_”t.NIi\/IHANS. is just, and proper.
‘[1′:¥.3,_._sMereiy Vfoeetauvse the petitioner’s application for
NIMHANS in response to the notification
for __ree1″tgit.rrient.. was forwarded through the institute,
Hthe proper channel for empioyed personnel, does not
Jriszesi: in the petitiorier a right to claim benefits on
VA V’ trémsfer to other Bodies. The submission of the learned
M
“[3,-
counsel deserves £1(‘.C.€p'{,E1l’1(f(3 in the Eight of Sect.ion–VH
of the ‘E’ransfe1’ of Persormel between Cemral
Government / Auton()n101.1s bodies V.
Government / Autonomous bodies e1n.d_A”»:icé.A_ ‘~vje3r€§a-«
KS