-3- IN THE men coum' or KARNATAKA AT _ :>.m:--:t> 11415 THE 33" mayo? _ é ' Be :1: 1. 13.51. Gec1ha_.. Sin late Aged about 4;"';¥-- 9 K " ' D/0 late 63.3. --BOri:_ggix=d Aged abe-131.15 .- V :3. G.3.:'1S1m1-mi' _ 3. "1«;a;cn;hi ._ Li/"o late (3.3. Bdmgawda ' Agczl ¢£:bo1'1t'«.1v3 ymrs ' '(:3 latc'(.ih;iiikzalingegowda .a'Bt;I.N. 85 years .A Petfiicéiier No.1 ia the wife V Petitioners No.2 to 3 are children 'P1=.*iit.iaonc'.r No.4 is father of deceased All we Rfa (icjjalagelc Maddur Taluk, Mandya. ..Appcflants (By Smt (3. P'raaectha, Adv.,) égéi 1. I-LM. Devaiah S/o Madaiah Huligercpura MJ3. Halli Post Maddur. Mandya Taluk Mandya. 2, The Divisional Managtrg United India Instuantx; _ V . ($0., Ltd., Opp. Siwlcr Jumlcc ' Park, M.C. Road, Mand.}r&_-57 ..Respondents
V’
This MFA» ‘unde”as::,?=’~mag11.1.?3»;_-1.1:.~51’M.v. Act against
the judment aand _3~3~Q0€}7 pass.-sad in MVC
No. 135/2005 ($11 the thevlfiivil’ (Sr.Dn.), MAUI’,
Maddur, partly ‘afiiowing “pétitien for compensation
and seeking cnhanézgnixcnt or cnmpénsaflon
_ “l’i1is “III! iin’ heating, thizz-3 day 1111: -uourt
delivered fixlifiwiiag : H “”” ”
1 ‘V i .7 7.’,-1;/’\%flr :3 G J;,§Jx»,r
‘ This tiled by the ckaimants-appellants stacking
e+.;1§1f§1$(:eti::é:xt:&oi’fiampensatian awanicad by the Triiaunal bchw.
§H€8I’d the leameci advocates appearmg on behalf of
fijanies and perused the matxmal on nxxaml.
W?
-3-
3. G.S.Ir5<meg(Hnda Lost his me in the
oecurmd on 25.11.2005, lcavmg
appellants as his legal Iepieseniaiiégs. i-HA<fi}v§a:s.:
yeara at the time of the a(,3(.'.i(l6i1¥,_ Ht-fwas sf; As:§;is5iant" L.
in Manmul I)aiIy, Grejgala" gem. figs awalded
compensation of R31), 1 llcfidé.
4. The salary ¢>ertflk$§’t.e’ 91¢”; is produced at
EXJ-‘–9, which ;7i,is:(§V3(;vrs»esi;At«t1a§bt,’ wiaiéwas iixfiwing net salary of
Rs.5,37’3_/–* and an; Rs.9.42£}[-. Apart fmm the
same, he i£z.a_s u311 ‘lhe. Rexxnrd of Rights cxuncm
are to Ex.P-1.4. It is by new well settled
fhat : has to be taken into oonaicieration whik:
under the head of loss of
V V’ . depéiadefiéy; H(lWt”f.VIE:t”, the tax ts.) be paid by the de%d will
” H ” _ Vhaw.:_ md11urt: catunot, lose. sight of the fact that deceased would have
V mtired wiihin about eight yctars. Having zegald, to the tmsfity
of the 1″am,s and (:iIc1.1mst3nCcs of the 03%, most: pHrtic’u]a1’ly,
W5
-4-
having regard tn the gross salary drawn by the
to his daath, this Court assesses the income ‘at
Rs.9.000/– per month. Out of the ‘
amount ham to be dmilmcd 1flrVE3§jId8’Vj_l’C}1(!’$E)I18l %.
deoeaseti. Having mgani ts) t1¥é’V.$§§;e_oi’ (i.e., 50
years), the proper Inuliéfiiiitsr l:_iiSV is Basal on
the aaid figures, the Rs.8,64,00{)}..
under the head. .. ,i.:;;:VVfiadciiii<31: to the same,
the claixnaafis V. <}{s.ES(),()0()/~ under four
-E~1()3f1V€’:l}.’tVZiI'(“)’ilVEi;§–. “‘l”f1’u$; in claimants-appellants are
entitled t($ 1git:;;j of Rs.9,14,()00[~. Accordingly,
_ fi1e..fi;gll{1wén.g §:_§;___;n.ade :
~. Aw};5;r_a_ “me mbuna: is modified. The. claimants»
awalded Ema] oompezlsatiun of Rs.9,14,()0(}/-
V. (3-<?,11)(:6$§"'¥;IiJl€ lakhs Ebufimn thcmsand only ) which Tm irmlusive
amoum. already awaxdcisci by the 'I'I'ibu11al, Wflh 6%
-»v.§:m,erest 13.3. on the enha11(x=.=d (x.3mpensation fmm the date of
petition till the date of It-alizaijmi. Award shall be drawn
\//”
-5-
aocnlrdingly. The apportionment and deposit ”
the imptlgnérd opcier cf the ‘l’ritmn.ai
Appeai is allowed in pact . 2 VV