High Court Karnataka High Court

B P Vijayalakshmi vs The Deputy Commissioner Hassan … on 3 April, 2008

Karnataka High Court
B P Vijayalakshmi vs The Deputy Commissioner Hassan … on 3 April, 2008
Author: K.L.Manjunath
IR 53% HIGH OOImTOFKARNM'M&AT 

DATE!) THIS THE 3" BAY OF A'£'RIL, 2008

EEFORE

was I-ION*BI..E ma. ausrxm 

wnrr PETITION 110.5394 or zooatmrlfm)  T

BETWEEN :

1

:3 p v1.mra.1.zuAB€i?}I_ v6G_ 

B '.19  2   . .
 Amm -39' "s::1::;_msV.,s/o Armamaama.

 
Mm)  '75 yams,

..'jLi:/Q}, 

  'R/éizommmmmx vxmmx,

 HQBLI, Shfiflhflfififlfl TALUK,

 xixsmzcm.

V"-P  *mmsamm

138$. A%U1' 44 Y3AR8,8/O  A

 14 maA1m% s/o MANJEGGWDA
 mm maovr so mans,

BOTH ARR R/0 mnom vtmmn YESALUR

uam:.1,aAm1.naspmzA '1-A:.ux,na.a.am n-zsmxcw : 

nzmzsmzm BY -rm am. momma,
9.:-Lcsmamsmxaa A/A 42 YEARS,

s/o LATE p.aAsApnA 2/o rmntm vxxmam,
rasaum mmz, samnnsmm 1-mm:



sass»: nxsmxm . . . mr:rIonmQ f 5'; 

(By Snrl: : K. NABB.VEN'I,ADV.}

AND :

1 15% DE!-PUT!' CCifl!IS8IOI@&
HASSAN DISTRIC1',EAS&W'-.,__

2 Tu pawn OO2~ISERVAT%___ G.'!§ 
BASSAN n1smxcwV,1§msaN. '  jé 

3 arm arms or   
ZREPTD. BY ms 
nzPAmmw«¢F% F-'fiawzm    ;
z~:.s.mxm.:N€s;vmmm Vim:  1.

    

(By   R1--3 3

THI:S_JLfl_P'.  nmxcms 226 a
227 or 3:31-:v._%cmIsT.I1=:J'rI6:~:. or Imn, wAx':ma 1'9:

  HI! h .;.-2   mm 
A3   .. ISSUED T0 Ti PB'.I.'ITI%'lIRS AND

 1: -------- yr. 11.2.2eoa 3:: arm R2 :
',R£'S9BCf'.!.'IV'fE1._!"._._IR so 1:-An AS -rm nmxrxcums .

  

.' A '1'*tii:!A iééfiition coming on for ¥z'e1im:i.nary-

  hearing  ii.-'_1;i.s day, the Gnvurt mach 
 _ fgllawingg '

Oflkh

A'  petitionm.-s are calling in quastion '

  legality and non.-actrmss of tha :cajec.-.t:i.on;é

 inf theix: application for grant ct' gelling;

pezrxnission by the respondents.

rK/

2. I have heard the laarnad

the parties .

3. In sim:i.1ax: circuwsufiiéésg ._

has disposed of sevvaz.-al writ

certain guidalines as

applications are the
re%den1:s and one is
w. P. No . 3932/ojz £098.

4. In” order, the
writ light of am
d1mct1«:;izs ” 3932/07 cnsposaa

of 15.2.2d£::a(i9:J5:f1f_n£m§vm.iSL ma arm .118. was

anssm AND (329%), the

to the respondents for

of the application of the

in accordance with law.

salt:

rjfidqe