IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAIIA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 87'" DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2010
BEFORE
THE E-IONBLE i\/IRJUSTICE3 N.ANANDA{
CRIMINAL PETITION No.42o5_oF mo 3;'.
Between:
B.'R.Ramesh
S/o Ramanada.
Aged about 54 years.
R/o No.l96 &197. I V_
Ward No.3. 12*" Cross'; _ _
Gowilgere Beedi, Bhadraivathvij
Shirnoga District, Petitioner
(By sri.B.s.PVr§1sé~;id;__t r\,CIV()€C'EViIt€'}'V 3 *** "
Arid' . . I . 'V
The State or
By N.R.Pol_iCe_ Stati--o'1iI, "
Mysore. . ._ " Respondent
_._{By Sf~¢i.Vij:1yakt1'mv;t_r_&Majage, High Court
ov"ernfn1eni't.« Pleader]
*$***
'T'1'1iS"é'1:"ii--IIii.f}i-11 Petition is filed under Section
439 "(if C*r'.i?..TC praying to enlarge the petitioner on
' 'bail in K.CR.No.155/10 of Narasimharaja Police
5.A"-..Stat?ion,*..Mysore City. which is registered for the
..of{en"e.e punishable under Section 2()(b){i) of
This Criminal Petition coming on for orders
day, the Court made the foiiowing:~
ORDER
Petitioner is arrayed as accused in Crime
i\io.155/10 registered for an offence punish–a_i2.i.e..A’
under Section 20sB of Narcotic
Pshychotropic Substances Act. 3.9a8.5′._
2. i have heard learned; couVdn—-s.ei. fo14-pe.t’itzioner
and learned High Court sfor
respondent »~ State. V V A i
3. I have been
records. whic;i1′”i}v_o’u1ci__ retréal'<» t'ii:at,____7_7kgs. of ganja
was seized froini.Vh'e_p'oAs'sessi_'on of petitioner.
4. ‘i’iie_1earn,ed’ic’ottnsei for the petitioner submits
.t1’i’1t§’tv-.iga3nja”not contained seeds, but also
ie.a’v¢§ Therefore, total quantity does not
exceed the fiermissible quantity.
in my Considered opinion. submission of
V”‘i._,»iea[i.”ned cousnel for petitioner has no basis. The
u;’tota1 quantity of ganja seized is 7.3 kgs. in the
W acat
Circumstances. it cannot be said that the seized
quantity of ganja was Eess than small quant.-iyy.
Considering the nature of offence alleged
petitioner ané punishment provided.
cannot be granted bail.
dismissed.
AHB H 4
1 M f s