B Veerendra Kumar vs State Of Karnataka on 10 June, 2008

  (By Sri T N RAGHUPATHY 3:. gm, G. JAYASHREZE , ADVGCEATES}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGAL§;~1é:§§'  "' 
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY otf-Jvm gc'f: é s._,' ' F7; 
PRESENT 1' " V 1 '  Q
THE ¥iON'Bi.,E MRCYRIAC     
wb   Z   
THE E~IGN'BLE MR.§IUST§CEV:flA_--.AN';~  Gowm

WRIT PET§TIQ¥3I NO.1§52Vi'léCd${.G.I'fl~i§'I'{.§N;- 1311,)

BEITWEEN:

1 B VEE£;ENDR:sT,%»I§UMjA:2_ 
S/O D BANc;AR;a?r>A"~ _ %   ~ ~
AGED 32«YE'-ARS, R,fj;-.f1*'MAMIJNATHANILAYA
BETTAMAKKI; 3EEB1:~m--KERE POST
'rHiR'rHAHALL1"'mxSiN,~~._ * ~'
 SH1}~eitQ{3;x DISTTRICT 577432

*2; .8 'R RAGHAVENDRA

 _ S; Q" LA'i'~'E 3:3  KARANTH
}'.s.G'E_i3 33."'  

-2 CENTRAL"VALLIIXTICIR'{3{?eMMI'I'TEE;"
CGMMITTEE .UIm33:I_2 'TH L1,_FfA_RNATAKA
STAMP (CONSTIT_U'F1'G1\I'I»OF'--CENTRAL
VAL{}AT¥O'M_(iC)Iv1'I\'!I'I"£?Ii?fiE'._ i~=%I:)'Iz "ESTIMATION,
PUBL1<:ATIc)r=«:_VAIID REVTISIGN (31? MARKET VALUE
GLIIQELINAES 0?. PRGPERFIES) RULES 2003
-- . RBPvIs35-If (:HAI§zMAI»I;,<:;QMMIsI'soNEre OF' STAMPS,
 , 'Ig;AI~I{;ALc:$I;*eI3:"" 

3 "":aIAgI{E':?:fV;:§;Li§;I%I'%Ie:,:N COMMITTEE

REF' BY ITS--SE{}REARY/ SUB REGESTRAR
 SHIMOGA DISTRICT .. RESPONDENTS

Petiiitm coining up for Admission on this day, the

CYRIAC: JOSEPH (2.1. {Oral} 4

Having heard ltaaxmzd C011I1S61f0r the«’j;)efi?j0;1ers–‘V–A211’§{<i

COI1Sid€IE{i the materials I1<)V%£;A'i1;i%{t1in¢d to
entertain this as a Public II1"ét3I'§VtV$.t::(' haw:
not Statfid that they ;'a:~§«':§,¥,vn6:3f$ of fiiawfijivififoperfies coverexi
by 111:: impugned It is 3230 120%
stated that of sucth lands] sites or

pmperiies. Heréw fire V'»3i«'.'f::'f, V…-:'s ciismissezd,

S&/-

Chiei Iustice

Sd/:2
Jifdfi