Gujarat High Court High Court

B vs State on 6 April, 2010

Gujarat High Court
B vs State on 6 April, 2010
Author: Ks Jhaveri,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/10319/1998	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 10319 of 1998
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

B
M PATEL EDUCATION TRUST & 1 - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 2 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
BIREN A VAISHNAV for
Petitioner(s) : 1   2.
 

MR JASWANT
K SHAH AGP for Respondent (s)	: 1 
MR RM DESAI for Respondent(s) :
2 - 3. 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 06/04/2010 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

1.0 By
way of present petition, the petitioners have prayed for following
relief/s:

(A) Allow
this petition with costs.

(B) Quash
and set aside the communications dated 12.10.1998 and 01.04.1998
being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the
Constitution of India.

(C) Declare
the action of the respondents in issuing the Resolution dated
21.05.1994, pursuant to which the D.E.O has passed the order dated
25.08.1998, as illegal and arbitrary as the same restrict the
School Management from recruiting the Teachers in the subjects of
their requirement and the School is thrust upon such Teachers which
are not required by them.

(D) Direct
the Respondent District Education Officer to permit the Petitioner
School to complete the process of selection, initiated pursuant to
the advertisement dated 11.06.1997, ignoring the orders dated
01.04.1998, 25.08.1998 and 12.10.1998 respectively.

2.0 Having
perused the materials produced on record, it transpires that by
efflux of time, the petition has become infructuous. Hence, the
petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is
discharged with no order as to costs. Interim relief, if any, stands
vacated. Liberty to revive in case of difficulty.

(K.S.JHAVERI,
J.)

niru*

   

Top