High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Babloo Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 26 July, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Babloo Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 26 July, 2011
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Cr.Misc. No.15942 of 2011
                           Babloo Yadav, son of Nageshwar Yadav
                                            Versus
                                    The State Of Bihar
                                          -----------

3. 26.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case

instituted for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian

Penal Code.

It is submitted that there is no eye witness to the

occurrence and the only allegation against the petitioner apart

from vague suspicion based on speculated motive, there is no

further material against him.

In view of such, let the petitioner in the event of

surrender, named above, within four weeks from the date of

receipt of this order, in connection with Dharhara P.S. Case No.

93 of 2010, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing

bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the

like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Munger, subject to conditions as laid down under Section

438(2) Cr. P.C., and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close

relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving

genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor

will undertake to furnish information to the court about any

change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit
2

shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any

other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)

That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the

court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case

of similar nature after his release in the present case and

thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the

proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv)

That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive

the police papers on the given date and be present on date

fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and

delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v)That the petitioner will be

well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two

consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

( Anjana Prakash, J.)
S.Ali