IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 10587 of 2010(W)
1. BABU.T.K., AGED 52 YEARS,
... Petitioner
2. SATHEENDRAN.K.K., AGED 50 YEARS,
3. AJITH KUMAR.T.A.,
4. SHERIN BABU.V.G., AGED 30 YEARS,
5. SUDARSANAN.M.R.,
6. THANKACHAN.V.K., AGED 36 YEARS,
7. SOMAN.P.V, AGED 46 YEARS,
8. BABU.K.A, AGED 42 YEARS,
9. MANIGALAN.K.K., AGED 50 YEARS,
10. A.M.JANARDHANAN, AGED 50 YEARS,
11. J.B.RAJESH, AGED 38 YEARS,
12. BABU.N.S, AGED 52 YEARS,
13. SREENIVASAN.M.A, AGED 45 YEARS,
14. SURESHBABU.M.K., AGED 40 YEARS,
15. K.M.SARAVANAN, AGED 46 YEARS,
16. P.M.GOPI, AGED 55 YEARS,
17. SURESH BABU.K.D, AGED 37 YEARS,
18. BIJU.V.G, AGED 35 YEARS,
19. DHANESH.P.S, AGED 34 YEARS,
20. KRISHNAN KUTTY.P.K., AGED 48 YEARS,
21. PATHROSE.P.J, AGED 41 YEARS,
22. BIBIN RAJ.T.K., AGED 29 YEARS,
23. BHAGAVAN.P.M, AGED 40 YEARS,
24. AUGUSTIN.P.J, AGED 54 YEARS,
25. ANTONY.P.X, AGED 51 YEARS,
26. P.G.JOSHYKUTTAN, AGED 48 YEARS,
27. K.L.GEORGE, AGED 34 YEARS,
28. JOHNSON.V.X, AGED 38 YEARS,
29. GEORGE.C.X., AGED 51 YEARS,
30. PRAKASAN.J.D, AGED 44 YEARS,
31. V.M.GEORGE, AGED 46 YEARS,
32. MANOJ.P.S, AGED 33 YEARS,
33. HOCHIMIN.P.M, AGED 24 YEARS,
34. J.A.SHYJU, AGED 31 YEARS,
35. J.V.VAJEESH, AGED 33 YEARS,
36. RAJESH.C.V, AGED 29 YEARS,
37. SUMESH.J.G, S/O.GOKULDAS,
38. JOSEPH.K.F, AGED 37 YEARS,
Vs
1. THE SECRETARY, KERALA HEAD LOAD
... Respondent
2. THE CHAIRMAN, KERALA HEAD LOAD
3. CHAIR PERSON, KERALA HEAD LOAD
4. CONVIENER, ERNAKULAM HEAD LOAD
For Petitioner :SRI.M.T.BALAN
For Respondent :SRI.KOSHY GEORGE
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.SURENDRA MOHAN
Dated :18/05/2010
O R D E R
K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J.
——————————————-
W.P.(C) No.10587 of 2010
——————————————-
Dated this the 18th day of April, 2010
JUDGMENT
It is submitted by Mr.Koshy George, the counsel for the
respondents that orders have been passed by the Kerala
Head load workers Welfare Board working out an
arrangement for sharing the head load work in the area.
The counsel for the petitioners submits that the order that
has been passed causes serious prejudice to the
petitioners. If the petitioners have any grievance against
the order so passed or the arrangement made by the
Board, they are free to challenge the same in appropriate
proceedings. Reserving the liberty of the petitioners to
challenge the order passed by the Welfare Board, this Writ
Petition is closed.
K.SURENDRA MOHAN,
JUDGE
css/