High Court Kerala High Court

Baby Smitha K.C. vs The State Of Kerala on 8 December, 2010

Kerala High Court
Baby Smitha K.C. vs The State Of Kerala on 8 December, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 36656 of 2010(F)


1. BABY SMITHA K.C.,W/O.RAJESH,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION

3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFIER,

4. THE MANAGER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :08/12/2010

 O R D E R
                 K.T.SANKARAN, J.
          ------------------------------
             W.P.(C).No.36656 OF 2010
          ------------------------------
                     th
      Dated this the 8  day of December, 2010




                     JUDGMENT

The petitioner was appointed as Full Time

Sanskrit Teacher in Azhikode West U.P.School with

effect from 1.6.2010 against a retirement vacancy.

The Manager submitted the proposal for approval of

appointment to the Educational Officer. As per

Ext.P2 staff fixation order for the academic year

2010-2011, the Full Time post of Sanskrit was

reduced to Part Time post on the ground that it is

an uneconomic school. The case of the petitioner

is that the Full Time post of Sanskrit teacher was

created by way of Group C diversion, as per Ext.P3

staff fixation order for 1991-92. It is also

submitted that in view of G.O.(Ms)

No.371/2000/G.Edn. dated 13.11.2000 (Ext.P4), the

reduction of the post to Part Time post was not

proper. Challenging the staff fixation order for

2010-2011, the petitioner filed Ext.P5 revision

W.P.(C).No.36656 OF 2010 2

dated 4.11.2010 before the Director of Public

Instruction. Ext.P5 is pending disposal.

2.Though several reliefs are claimed in the

Writ Petition, the learned counsel for the

petitioner submitted that for the time being, it

would be sufficient, if Ext.P5 revision is directed

to be considered expeditiously.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner

and the learned Government Pleader.

Taking into account the facts and circumstances

of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of

directing the Director of Public Instruction to

consider and dispose of Ext.P5 revision dated

4.11.2010 submitted by the petitioner, as

expeditiously as possible, and at any rate, within

a period of two months from the date of receipt of

a copy of the judgment, after affording an

th
opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and 4

W.P.(C).No.36656 OF 2010 3

respondent Manager. The petitioner shall produce a

copy of the Writ Petition and a certified copy of

the judgment before the Director of Public

Instruction. The petitioner shall also send a copy

of the Writ Petition and a copy of the judgment to

th
the 4 respondent Manager by registered post and

the petitioner shall produce a proof of the same

before the Director of Public Instruction.

K.T.SANKARAN,
JUDGE.

cms