High Court Kerala High Court

Baby vs State Of Kerala Represented By on 4 June, 2008

Kerala High Court
Baby vs State Of Kerala Represented By on 4 June, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 3567 of 2008(B)


1. BABY, AGED 44 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :04/06/2008

 O R D E R
                            K.HEMA, J.
                   -------------------------------------------
                         B.A.No.3567 of 2008
                   -------------------------------------------
                Dated this the 4th day of June, 2008


                                   ORDER

This petition filed for anticipatory bail.

2. According to the prosecution on 8.4.2008, at about

12.30 p.m., petitioner was found carrying 4.5 litres of Indian

made Foreign liquor. The petitioner was intercepted and articles

were seized. But, she could not be arrested for want of women

constables. The offence alleged is under Section 58 of the

Abkari Act. The petitioner apprehends arrest and detention and

hence, this petition.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

submitted the allegations made as per the available records will

not constitute offence under Section 58. Applying the dictum

laid down in Sabu vs. State of Kerala (2003(2) KLT 173)

there is only a bailable offence in this case. The mere possession

of Indian made Foreign liquor is not sufficient to make out an

offence under Section 58 of Abkari Act. But the Section having

been quoted wrongly as Section 58 of Abkari Act, it will be

difficult to get bail from lower court. Hence, petitioner seeks

anticipatory bail, failing which he will suffer great hardship.

BA NO.3567/08 2

4. The learned public prosecutor submitted that the

crime is under investigation. According to him, the purpose for

which the article is carried has to be found out. On hearing both

sides, especially in the light of the dictum laid down in Sabu vs.

State of Kerala (2003(2) KLT 173), I find that anticipatory bail

can be granted on conditions.

5. Hence, the following order is passed:

(i) The respondent is directed to release the petitioner in

the event of her arrest on her executing bond for Rs.25,000/-

(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two solvent sureties

each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court below, if the

petitioner surrenders and files bail application.

(ii) The petitioner shall report before the Investigating

officer on every Monday and Thursday between 10 a.m. to 1 p.m.

(iii) If the petitioner is involved in any offence of similar

nature, the bail is liable to be cancelled.

The petition is allowed.

K.HEMA, JUDGE

csl