High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Baij Nath Singh vs The State Of Bihar & Ors. on 10 August, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Baij Nath Singh vs The State Of Bihar & Ors. on 10 August, 2011
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                       Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.472 of 2011
                                      Baij Nath Singh
                                           Versus
                                The State Of Bihar & Ors.


4   10.8.2011

The petitioner has filed the instant application for

alleged violation of the order dated 18.11.2008 passed in

Cr.W.J.C. No.1074 of 2007. In the concluding paragraph of

the order this court observed that the Superintendent of Police,

Patna will himself supervise the matter and final form would

be filed after the same is vetted by him. This court further

observed that it would be open to the petitioner to file a

representation raising all his grievances before the Senior

Superintendent of Police, Patna who will examine the same

and pass appropriate order in accordance with law.

So far as first part of the order is concerned,

learned State counsel submits that the investigation had

already been concluded before passing of the order dated

18.11.2008. So far as filing of the representation before the

Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna is concerned, it has

been stated that no application has been filed by the petitioner.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that in

pursuance of the order of this court dated 18.11.2008 the

petitioner filed his representation on 19.12.2008 to the Senior

Superintendent of Police, Patna. He further submits that the

seized arms has not been examined as yet whereas learned

State counsel has submitted the seized arms have been sent to
2

the District Arms Magistrate, Patna for examination and for

establishment of its owner as would be evident from

paragraph 3 of the order dated 18.11.2008.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the

case, it would be open for the petitioner to take advantage of

the same in course of the trial.

With the aforesaid observations, this contempt

application stands disposed of.

(S.P. Singh,J)
KHAN