Posted On by &filed under High Court, Madras High Court.


Madras High Court
Baluswamy vs Lakshmanan And Ors. on 16 August, 1898
Equivalent citations: (1898) 8 MLJ 193


JUDGMENT

1. I am asked to say that a purchaser who was also decree-holder may, in defiance of his own agreement, insist on an order under Section 318. It is clear to my mind that the Judge intended to find that there was an agreement between the parties and that under it Rs. 1,100 had been received by the purchaser. The case cited (Muttia v. Appasami, I.L.R., 13 M., 504) is an authority against the purchaser, for it shows that an agreement like the present may bind him.

2. I dismiss the appeal with costs.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

66 queries in 0.112 seconds.