MFA.No.9254.200'?
.. 1 ..
I!lTHE!ilG!-I COW' 0FKARHLTA!{AA'l'BAlGALO%
DAT$D'l'!il81'!E2'l'"'DAYOFJUHEfl00B I
BBFO%
'mm nonrnm mmavsnw n.a.mwIa!5_fi@% ' 3.j if
O
N'
BANGALORE aEv1,oPMErrrE'A.u'rHot2rI*E
SANKEY ROAD ' ._ '- V
BANGALORE V' " .
RE?RESEN'I'ED BY ITS COMM_I_S;'~'..!O?éER
SR1 A c RAME GOW,UA.__ * j " ...AP?ELI.ANT
{BY SR1 K RAMA BHAT, ADV.) ' ' " }
SR1. sAM.pATmEaJtx E I
S/0'ALA"'I'.E :1' cuamamgzas
AGED,AB€_)UT"41'YEA_RS_ '*
R/AT 140,; 1.121,. 32:» cgoss
ma MAIN, sun" BLOC-K
,.JgAYAP£A(3AR,"BANGA,'i:ORE RESPONDENT
V. (Ev Asia: KE} JEGANNAWAEPA, ADV FOR
_ SRI’ s§:2:g’As’H,EKERA mxsrnrr, ADV.)
Wrxéiis n§EA:E EILEE U/ORDER 43 RULE my OF cpc,
‘ ” AGAIN’*$;’I’ 1§:=4E.oRoER DATED 3/3/07 PASSED on 1.9.30.2 IN
‘0.S.NO.!..2’?’8/G7 ON THE FILE OF THE XXVI! A1)z3L.crrY CIVIL
:;-j~.__JUDGE, BANGALORE. ALLOWING I.A.N0.21 FILED U/ORBER
– 39 Eu.I,.E 1 AND 2 R/W 3:30.151 0? cm FOR TEMPORARY
INJEINCZPION.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR AIDNHSSION THIS DAY, THE
‘if ‘CQEjR’P DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
MF’A.No.9C254.2007
_ 2 –
JUDGIIEHT
This appeal by the defendant —
Development Authority is do 1: ‘
interlocutoly order dated 8.3.2007″;§@aseogi A
filed by the mam’ tifl’ in the suit moo.s ._§o.
by the trial Conn: — the
Civil Judge, the
appellant/defendant mi; the
plaintiffs of oropcrty and
also from oonstmction
put up disposal of the
suit.
.2. oounscl for the: parties
vimpugned order. Having regard to the
it is appropriate to d’n’ect both the
_ status-quo, as on today, in respect
property on the disposal of the suit.
accordingly. The trial court is do to
of the suit expeditiously and E1 any event
\&>/
MFA.No.9254.2007
-3-
within six months from the date of receipt] production
of copy of this order.
3. The appeal is disposed of f
modification of the order
Appeal disposed of. ” « :1}
ftzfigé