Loading...

Banwari Yadav & Anr vs State Of Jharkhand on 14 March, 2011

Jharkhand High Court
Banwari Yadav & Anr vs State Of Jharkhand on 14 March, 2011
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                                   B. A. No. 8500 of 2010
          1. Banwari Yadav
          2. Mandodri Devi                                ..... Petitioners
                                         Versus
          The State of Jharkhand                          ..... Opposite Party
                                         -----
                   CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI
                                         -----
          For the Petitioners    - Mr. Laljee Sahay
          For the State          - Mr. A.P.P
                                         -----

4/14.3.2011

The petitioners are in custody in connection with the case registered under

Sections 304(B)/34 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been

falsely implicated in this case; the petitioner No.1 is the father-in-law and the petitioner

No.2 is the mother-in-law of the deceased; there are omnibus and general allegations

against the petitioners and other family members; the petitioners’ elder son Manoj

Yadav (the co-accused) with almost similar allegations has been granted bail by this

Court in B. A. No. 8189/2010; other co-accused Mamta Devi has also been granted bail

by the Court below, as has been stated in Paragraph 8 of the bail application; the

petitioners are in custody since June 2010; the petitioners are the local permanent

residents and there is no chance of their absconding.

Learned A.P.P opposed the petitioners’ prayer for bail and submitted that the

co-accused Manoj Yadav had taken the plea that he was living separately. However, he

has not disputed the other factual contentions submitted by learned counsel for the

petitioners.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, both the above named

petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/-

(Ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

the C.J.M, Giridih in connection with Bagoder (Sariya) P. S. Case No. 107/10,

corresponding to G. R. No. 1209/10.

    S.K                                                           (NARENDRA NATH TIWARI, J)
 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More Information