High Court Karnataka High Court

Basanagouda vs Malatesh S/O Veerabhadrappa on 25 March, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Basanagouda vs Malatesh S/O Veerabhadrappa on 25 March, 2008
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar


WWW” WW”<"* MWW%§ %m.:%mmwM:m%M mmm mmm' CW' mmmmm W33?! CGURT Q? mwwmm W§€§% QWUW"? WP %fi%N&Tfi%& §~E¥\&"§§~«E awum

nnm mum coma' <35 xamwmmxr
mmnmm am 25%: new or amen 29968 ; f _ 7

B-'EF'0fi

ma aozmm rm. mama 7

n;s*.A,xo.3ae?'g2oxd?:as\q %

B&3AKaG€XIDA
s:o
RIOHIREKERUR
HAVERIDIST, % %

Hows?

{By Sri Loxsaa A1 L %

1

» RIG
rag, aravnm nm

,2 T J mmam

?’Lm%eqm1.m-c. 0W. R

ENT8

%”%’;5y«§§ri%1:UmoaI9z:aAFoRR23

mm mm was 173113 or mncrnmmsr rm
JUDGIIENT morn Awam mm 13112106 rassm IR

wmmm wk” w~w.m~n§mw§.mm maww mawwm ws_.t”,_s§.nmNMaMnM flawm vswuum Ur’ wfimmmwww. mwm %,..£,.3’MK! QM” §%,§-»’m’/iE’%§\$$<°a%"M%%« Mmvfi €J.T@§.§R%" WE' ?%..4$1'»'eRiNM¥'.a%fi(.é% HIQM QQURT

mm RC1649103 ON THE FEE OF AI3DL.('.'-NIL

taxman) & Anm..mc.'r, RANEBENIIUR, mm? ~ x
mm cum pmrrrcm mu ccmmaanox

ENEAR OF GOEFEBBATION.

mm. mm COIIBIG on ma H2a%»ué.ma %?Iizak%§t>A¥.?VT%:*

THE CGIIRI DELIVERED ‘I’M

Tm appeal is praymg for
t the tribunal

mm on 3.1.2003.

tine gusma fracture of lumbar

of the ir1juri1.-as sustained, the

and fiuion and exteminn are

ha: epined that the claizmnt has

dhalzfility. However, the tribtmal has
A 1 * the disability at was at” the whole body and
m.:2s,ooo;- .

3. ‘nwmcamnt b: any dispute that lumbar
Sfllvertnhraiaonaoftlzempormznxbaneoftlxehady.

I/~4

z~w&»% {mm

Bemum of the injuries, the lumbar spine

and maxim: and mzterminn are ratriactad.

. is agafi about 45 ymra at the timgof »
was mug 1-mm: business.

sustainsad the claimant man -13: am”: k%

for pain and sufla’ermg’ nu! hand

Ve¢”‘*&fli&””€:$\«$§”‘fi WWW Wxmmmmm WWW W mwnwmm Wm mam’ W mwfimwa mm mm? W

loan of future ”

4. The tritrunax the

chum at Ru.5oI’%%m%Tdé¥%e *5 *1′-‘=
yam-‘£003. The having 9.

H0131. Even a have anrnad
Ra.l00f__-_.-_P61′ dminé period. Hence, this
Court of the szthinmnt at Ra.1OG[~–
i£&§ man be entitled no

xs.5i:5D0€3!* has of future swung’ due

1096 disability is taken into eomiaermm
F % is adopm for the said purpose. The

V4 ‘m thavefawe awarded Ra.9,fIX3I- undw the
headbaaofmoomcsdurmtltwlaidupperiod. Intha

r/5

xwms mm” mmmwmmmm wmm mwuagm %J,E”~¥f’\flKW#’-K%fiY\.M rsmm Iwuum ur mmammmsm Mmm mmm M?” mmMwm.m,m§ Mm?”-% mmzm” Q5 aagmwnmm MGM EQURT

absenoc afreoords pertaining to the

expenses. Thus, in all tm

Hence, thefiflhwizzlg order:

oanEfi _

Thu     tn

Ru.3.,19,0[IZ|,|’– with 5% Ai:1fei_ % of petition

am the. date’: oubstitutea the
at shall be deposited in
any flaw claimant’; choice. 11»

1:’ k; to time.

, Award shall be drawn. Appeal in

»fVflW”flhum;

wfih &fl§

Judfi