High Court Karnataka High Court

Basavaraj @ Budi vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 October, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Basavaraj @ Budi vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 October, 2008
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri
 

 .  BANGALQRE..'

IN THE HIGH couar OF KARNATAKA AT mNc;AL¢é$%F    *

DATED THIS THE 17"" DAY OF.QCTQ&BEj§;'jO£§'}34    V

BEFORE A   %
THE HON'BLE MR... JUSTICE".§§'fdQK"B';  
CRL. PETITION No.3%9?§fiS%0:=%A%_2o¢8   
BETWEEN V _  5 _ "  u 

BASAVARAJ @ Bum   1 j;
5/0. BASAVANNA _     :
AGED 21 YEARS,  _ _     
R/AT c/0. vswuacwnm I:V§::g:3Y45,La,zL.c>::s:_G"r_, A
21*" MAIN RQAQ, ' _  "     ..  
NEARVIDYA J¥(.1T:-iI"5cHc:~:;_n..,   
3-IONGASANDRA, BAN~{§A_LQRE. _  M

  A  " .   %  PETITIONER

('$331 Ci'i£9§'fi1A:¥'3RAP_§3'J'!\VK N, ADVOCATE)
AND % . 'V  % A
'rt-is #s*m'rE%*<§F Ei?AR§£ATAKA %%%% M

REPVBY TH'E.. STATIQ'a\E HQUSE OFFICE
MADIWALA PCLICE ":'3Tg'\'l'.l'ON

 RESPONDENT

L (av SRI HQNNAPPA, HCGP)
‘ TH1S'”€RL,P IS FILED L!/5.439 cam: By THE ADVGCATE FOR

.PETVITTI9’P4ER PRAYING THAT THIS HOBPBLE COURT MAY BE
‘ PIEEASED; TO ENIARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN

CF%If*3E:.N0§504f2003 OF MADIWALA P.S., BANGALORE CFW. PENDING

‘. ~€A3N”T.HE FILE or THE VI ADDL.CMM., BANGALORE wmca IS REGD.
}%r{cm we orvemces P/U/5.394 or nvc.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS BAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLGWING:

Q_RJ2_E_B

The respondent registered Crfme.;t4~et..504″” V’

offence punishabie under Section 394

2. The case of the prosecution’€n”briet ie aecused
persens intercepted the Mafutj thevvheetnpiainant
and ethers were carrying a The three
metercycies came v’an:”%ahe.eialtberateiy dashed
against the van the van stops it. The
accused were ‘éFhe$?V’t:roke the masses of the
van. when the tesisted the attempt ef the
accused toVsnateh’«the they (the inmates of thecar)
wara..v’Aaseat:~!tet§. A. Thereafier the accused ran away taking

Fts.V36,{1’.3V;18£}2’«.g’T Sessions Court turned down the

tp_etitionerfa”teqaeetjiir the grant of bail,

The..i’aarned counsei appearing fer the petitiener, Sri

:.’Ch’a-ndtappa submits that what is recovered from the

;5te§an.t.accused is onty Rs.5e,£300/~ and that he is not identified

‘am? manner.

$354.