Basf India Ltd vs John Leo D Souza on 23 November, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED TI-HS THE 23% DAY OF NOVEMBER 
BEFORE ' I I

THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHA_SH'v:'I3.,VAIfA);I  I'

M F A NO.9086 OF ' (LAC)-I 'A ~ .1: '--   'I, 

BETWEEN

BASF {INDIA} LTD,
sURATIIKAL--EAJ1:>E ROAD,

BALA, VIA KATIPALLA, F 

MANGALORE574 192, " I .   L 

REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER f 
sEcRETARIALAI\rD,LEGAI;;--J;   *

SR1. RRADEEF;:I'IAI$IDAI\I. =:  I"A'5"~.......;..APPELLANT/S

(BY SRIK.  I

AND

1. JOIIAI LEO D-'SC'UZA";«-- 

s/O. LATE .1O;:5EF:~I'D"sOU2:A,

1::/O. LIGORY'D'sOUzA.

 '~':iRQN SON H'OLIS.'€+3"

A I  IDDYA VILLAGE, SURATHKAL,
" ~ _M'ANGALORE TALUK--574 I91.

2". =   LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,
 BAIKAMPADY,
MANGALORE-575 011  RESPONDENT/S

if *  SR1. VIJAY KRISHNA, ADV. FOR R1,
 T *  = .SRI.B.R. SRINIVASA GOWDA, ADV. FOR R2]

THIS ME A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54(1) OF LA ACT,

 "AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND AWARD DATED: 8.4.2008



2

PASSED IN LAC.NO.108/I996 ON THE FILE OF THE IADDL.
CIVIL JUDGE {SR.DN] AND CJM, MANGALORE, PARTLY
ALLOWING THE REFERENCE PETITION FOR ENHANCED
COMPENSATION

THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellant

of pecuniary jurisdiction, the rnatterhas to bed’

District Court as the valuation is less

also submits that in connected appeal this I

Court has directed the office toAp_ret;urn”‘i’he appeal Memo to the

appellant to be presented”bleforerhthei.onal Court.

2. in MFA 9085/2008
and also consi0Ie’ring’ of this appeal being
less than Rs.5x,O(Ia,IO0.i:3A/’–V, Ethel’-appseal is required to be presented
b’eIoi=’e ‘ a”p.pr’opriateSI”‘C’ourt. Accordingly, the appeal is

of. office is directed to return the appeal for

Iiggresentiiiiglhbefore” ‘:11; appropriate Court within one week from

-. Iijthe date of retuirn.

Sd/’-3″

Judge