High Court Karnataka High Court

Basheeruddin S/O Mohammad … vs Ghouse Mohinuddin S/O Omarsab on 20 February, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Basheeruddin S/O Mohammad … vs Ghouse Mohinuddin S/O Omarsab on 20 February, 2009
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy
  

NATAKA HIGH comm' cs KARNATA.|{£3tI. I-IIGH ceum W %aIarI»§;IIwIA H¥GH.(2QURT 05 KARNATAKA HIGH COURT HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA I-net-I coma

-1-

IN THE HIGH com? or KARNATI3&I:I1§,.:AI:]I:   x '

cxncurr amen AT (.I'rj(ILBAI2.{':A..'::j~.. J  -

DATED THIS THE 20th DAY Q1? FEI3Ri}Ai2Y;'- é'c;4«;r::;_ 

BEFCIRE .
THE HONBLE MR.JUSTIC_}E"RAM_ Mérim REDDY
W39. No. i:'2.§9.i§3.0(1%;8j'IGM'--~iVA1{F}

BETWEEN:     % 
Basheerudgiirxv 44  _. _    
S/0 Mohammaéi_,.OS1nafiS:jab','*--  3

Age: 53   V.M!1tL1jIfaIii,... .  .

Jamiyzji Masjidg .Simi.zar,4 " _

R/0 si:warTa1:I1{;II.I%'I     '

Manvi, Dist. Raia.m ow KARNATAKA HIGH COUR!' or KARNATAKJ

-3-

jurisdiction under Secfion 64 of the Act   
persan discharging dimes as I\;fi:tj1L1véz1ii.;.-;fi1fi'«jt1fi;=3r€:aft$r' j  A'

proceed under Section $3 of A. A(:i _~t.(A>" 

Muthuvaili by fellowing  Ruié
55 of the WAICF Ruic%s,A_  % u  

2. The »;;I:m;g)Lgon 10.04.2007 ----
 .51  in the Eight of the
obse13.ra.t".id:'m§' 13-'gzade having remained

withfmt'-a ""1:~.1:feferred this writ petition.

3.  --» Sril leazned Counsal for the

 .,   press the relief ts quash the order

   2007 »- Annexugre 'E' of the Tribunal

but  that the mtitioner would be satisfied with a

 ndirec1Ei<:}1:; to respondent N63,? to 4 ta consider the

fietitiozzefs representation – Axmexure ‘F’ to appoint a

V’ “”:Muthuva11i.

éz?fi£§’.&i{..& NEG?-E COURT OF KARNATAf(A” «i.f£iG’i-I COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA kififiueéé €I5L”3%..§i¥&’ §.«§jGf-i cguar or KARNAYAKA I-HGH COURT

V erder.

-4-

4. Learned Counsel for the 15* 4′
that the 15* respondent filed R.A;ee~’No5 the
WAKE’ Tribunal, Gulbarga

dated 21st February 2OO7, t1f:1_ie”~=appeaA.V’ 2e_r<;A%.Tj r§&.e3eje2'0€35 of"?

the petitioner was aE3owed,n-""Le;afne=;_d submits
that his application is by the WAKE?

Board and he for the east of

Muthuvalii: ‘ J ‘ .’

5. in petition is allowed in part.

A direetuioyai vie’ ies’uv.ed.._”-~’L’to respondent N032 to 4 to

V. ecneiéet _t:he ‘”petiotioner’s application and all other

L’ flied pursuant to the Invitation, after due

p3;bnc::ge%~e;}a¢r Section 53 of the WAKE’ Act and Rule 55

of ther’AR’e1es, in any event withizx a gaeriod of three

“ii ffiéfiihs from the date of receipt; of certified copy of this

Rbv.