IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.29391 of 2010
1. BECHAN DAS S/O JOLHA DAS
2. DEVENDRA GOIT @ RADHE SHYAM GOIT
S/O MADHESHWAR GOIT
3. JOGENDRA SAHNI S/O GAURI SAHNI
4. KRISHNA KUMAR THAKUR S/O MANGNU THAKUR
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
2. 31.08.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the
petitioners and the State.
The petitioners seek bail in a case
instituted for the offence under Sections 121,
121-A, 124 of the Indian Penal Code and 17 of
the Criminal Law Amendment Act.
Considering that the petitioners are in
custody for recovery of an objectionable map but
has no criminal antecedents, let the petitioners
above named, be released on bail on furnishing
bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each or any other
surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the
satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Madhubani in connection with Basopatti P.S.
Case No. 47/2010, subject to the conditions, (i)
2
That one of the bailor will be a close relative of
the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving
genealogy as to how he is related with the
petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish
information to the Court about any change in
address of the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit
shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an
accused in any other case and if they are they
shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor
shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the
court concerned if the petitioners are implicated
in any other case of similar nature after their
release in the present case and thereafter the
court below will be at liberty to initiate the
proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of
misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will give an
undertaking that they will receive the police
papers on the given date and be present on date
fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two
given dates and delays the trial in any manner,
their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons
3
of misuse, (v) That the petitioners will be well
represented on each date if they fail to do so on
two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to
be cancelled.
With regard to the petitioner nos. 1, 2
and 3 local bailor shall be required since they
belong to Nepal and preferably government
servants and with regard to petitioner no. 4 one
of the bailor shall be the father of the petitioner.
Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )