Benny Thomson vs Angamaly Municipality on 25 September, 2008

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 26237 of 2008(W)


1. BENNY THOMSON, S/O.THOMSON,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. ANGAMALY MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS
                       ...       Respondent

2. SIBI DAVIS, MUNDADAN HOUSE,

3. BIJU PAULOSE, ARAKKAL HOUSE

4. M.O.JOY, MADATHUMUDI HOUSE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.V.SOHAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.SAIBY JOSE KIDANGOOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :25/09/2008

 O R D E R
                        S.SIRI JAGAN, J
                 ==================
                  W.P(C)No.26237 of 2008
                 ==================
       Dated this the 25th day of September, 2008.

                       J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is challenging Ext.P9 order passed by the

1st respondent pursuant to Ext.P6 judgment on the ground that

the petitioner has not been given a notice and hearing before

issuing Ext.P9 order as directed in Ext.P6 judgment. The

learned Standing Counsel for the Municipality now submits

that a fresh order would be passed after issuing notice to the

petitioner and hearing him. This is recorded and the writ

petition is disposed of.

S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

rhs