Bhami Vittaldas Shenoy vs Town Panchayat Bantwal on 30 May, 2008

3

2. Learned counsel for the 3"'   

unable to point out to any jeriédidioc cam 

respondent to hear and dispose of  

appropriately, when filed bcroxéjeae
under the Rules, leariieg the
order Annexure-“L” of one without
jurisdiction aa..__(.3T§>1§ViS3Quenoe, the
resolution Panchayath not
being under the Rules, is
also V ” ”

3. I11 “i:he the writ petition is

V’ »:The reecitition A1mex11::’e«~”K” and the order

quashed and the proceeding remitted

to Panchayath, Bantwal to extend an

of hearing to the parties on 23-06-2008 at

a.m. and pass orders Within a forlznight

:.’t_1_1eref1’om, strictly in accordance with law. The parties

~ directed to present themselves either in person or

M

4

through representatives on 23.06.2008, without ._

notice from the Municipal Council.

KS