IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WA.No. 1680 of 2008()
1. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, A
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THAZHAKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
... Respondent
2. SECRETARY,
3. K.J. JOSEPH, S/O. OUSEPH MATHAI,
4. MURALI THAZHAKKARA,
5. OOMMEN NINAN, S/O. NINAN,
For Petitioner :SRI.MATHEWS K.PHILIP,SC, BSNL
For Respondent :SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN
The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU
The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER
Dated :24/09/2008
O R D E R
H.L.DATTU, C.J. & A.K.BASHEER, J.
-------------------------------------------
W.A.No.1680 of 2008
-------------------------------------------
Dated, this the 24th day of September, 2008
JUDGMENT
H.L.Dattu, C.J.
Ext.P2 is an order/resolution passed by the first respondent
Grama Panchayat. Aggrieved by that order, the appellant was before this
Court in W.P.(C) No.6021 of 2008. The learned Single Judge by his
orders dated 1st of April, 2008 has rejected the writ petition. That is how
the petitioner in the writ petition is before us in this writ appeal.
(2) The matter is posted for admission today. Learned
counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of the Court to
withdraw the writ appeal with liberty to the appellant to approach the first
appellate authority against Ext.P2 order/resolution passed by the Grama
Panchayat.
(3) In our opinion, if the request made by the learned
counsel for the appellant is granted, it would not cause any prejudice to
anyone of the parties in the writ petition or in the writ appeal. Therefore,
we dispose of the writ appeal as under:
ORDER
i) Writ appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
ii) The appellant is permitted, if it so desires, to approach the
W.A.No.1680 of 2008
2
first appellate authority, if for any reason it is aggrieved by Ext.P2
order/resolution passed by the Grama Panchayat. If for any reason, the
appellant files an appeal, the appellate authority would decide the same in
accordance with law untrammelled by any observations made by the
learned Single Judge while disposing of the writ petition.
iii) All the contentions of both the parties are left open.
(4) In view of the order passed in the writ appeal the relief
sought for in I.A.No.856 of 2008 need not be considered at this stage.
Accordingly, the said application is rejected.
Ordered accordingly.
(H.L.DATTU)
CHIEF JUSTICE
(A.K.BASHEER)
JUDGE
vns