Gujarat High Court High Court

Bharatbhai vs Sahyog on 16 March, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Bharatbhai vs Sahyog on 16 March, 2011
Author: S.R.Brahmbhatt,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/4314/1995	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 4314 of 1995
 

With


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 10753 of 1994
 

 
=========================================================


 

BHARATBHAI
SHANATILAL SHETH - Petitioner
 

Versus
 

SAHYOG
CO-OERATIVE BANK LTD & 2 - Respondents
 

=========================================================
Appearance : 
MR
BHARAT JANI for
Petitioner: 1, 
RULE SERVED for Respondents : 1, 3, 
MR GIRISH D
BHATT for Respondent : 1, 
None for Respondent : 2, 
SERVED BY
AFFIX.-(R) for Respondent : 2.2.1
 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 16/03/2011 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

On
17.02.2011, the Court passed the following order :

This
matter was called out twice. On both the occasions, none has remained
present for the petitioner. On earlier occasion, this Court (Coram:
Jayant Patel, J.) on 11.01.2010 passed the following order:

As
a last opportunity, at the request of Mr. Jani, time to comply with
the earlier directions is granted upto 27.1.2010, failing which the
matter shall stand dismissed.

Today,
as could be seen from the matter, no steps have been taken and no one
is present to explain as to why steps have not been taken. Hence,
matter is required to be dismissed for default. Order accordingly.
Rule discharged.

(S.R.BRAHMBHATT,
J.)

Further
Order:

After
above order was passed, Mr. Jani appears and requests for reviving
the petition. Request is accepted. At his request, above order is
recalled. Matter is adjourned to 24.02.2011.

Today,
when the matter was called out, no one is present for the
petitioners. Hence, matters are dismissed for default. Rule
discharged. Registry is directed to keep the copy of this order in
each matter.

(S.R.BRAHMBHATT,
J.)

pallav

   

Top