High Court Kerala High Court

Bhaskaran Anavathukkal vs The District Judge on 1 August, 2007

Kerala High Court
Bhaskaran Anavathukkal vs The District Judge on 1 August, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

OP No. 23129 of 2000(C)



1. BHASKARAN ANAVATHUKKAL
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. THE DISTRICT JUDGE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ

                For Respondent  :SRI.U.P.KUNIKULLAYA

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :01/08/2007

 O R D E R
                      Antony Dominic, J.
             ========================
                     O.P.No.23129 of 2000
             ========================

            Dated this the 1st day of August, 2007.

                           JUDGMENT

Petitioners who are Process Servers in different courts filed

this Original Petition mainly to quash Ext.P1, Kerala Judicial

Ministerial Subordinate Service Rules, 1975 to the extent Rule 10

thereof provides that candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes/

Scheduled Tribes, who have passed standard VII or its equivalent

will be considered eligible for appointment as Amin. It is

submitted that in terms of the Rules, the posts of Amins are to be

filled up by direct recruitment and by promotion which is from

Attenders and Class II employees and the petitioners are aspiring

for promotion in that category. It is stated that the promotion

posts available to Amin are the posts of Typist, Lower Division

OP 23129/00 -: 2 :-

Clerk, etc. for which the minimum qualification is S.S.L.C.

According to the petitioners, if the candidates belonging to

Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes who have not passed S.S.L.C.

were appointed as Amins, there will not be further avenues of

promotions for them and they will stagnate in the post.

Consequently resultant stagnation will be caused to others also.

It is in these circumstances that this Original Petition is filed

seeking to quash Rule 10 of Ext.P1 as stated above.

2. On behalf of the eighth respondent, a counter affidavit

has been filed in which it is stated as follows:

“11. None of the grounds raised in the writ

petition are legally sustainable. The High Court and

Government have now decided to delete the proviso to

Rule 10 of Kerala Judicial Ministerial Subordinate

Service Rules, which provides for the relaxation in

qualification to Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribes

candidates and Ex-servicemen for the appointments to

the post of Amin. The draft amendment in notification

form has been forwarded from the High Court to the

Government. The matter is under consideration of the

Government.

12. Amendment to delete the proviso to Rule

10, of Kerala Judicial Ministerial Subordinate Service

OP 23129/00 -: 3 :-

Rules has not yet been notified. Until then

appointments could be made only as per the existing

rules. As such Rule 10 provides that ex-servicemen

and candidates belonging to Scheduled

Caste/Scheduled Tribe who have passed Standard VII

or its equivalent will be considered eligible for

appointment as Amin. The appointments of

respondents 3 to 7 were on the basis of the above

provision. It is a fact that the career prospects of the

petitioners are diminished because of these

appointments.”

It is evident from the above that the complaint now raised by the

petitioners before this Court has been accepted by the

Government and remedial action is being taken and according to

them, amendment is only to be notified.

3. In view of above, no further orders are called for in this

Original Petition except to direct finalisation of the proceedings

for amendment as undertaken in paragraphs 11 and 12 of the

counter affidavit of the eighth respondent. Such process shall be

completed by the eighth respondent within a period of six months

from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioners

OP 23129/00 -: 4 :-

are directed to produce copy of this judgment before the eighth

respondent for compliance.

Original Petition is disposed of as above.

Antony Dominic,
Judge.

ess 1/8