High Court Karnataka High Court

Bhaskare Gowda vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 November, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Bhaskare Gowda vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 November, 2010
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer
IN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT 

DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NoVEMBER_2o-1   ;_. A' 

BEFORE

THE HoN'BLE MR. JUSTICE  A1s'Dj:JI;._N;é,:zsER  . T 1:'

WRIT PETITION Nos.254331~446;*2o'10{EIJN--o'1A)  

BETWEEN:

1.

Bhaskare Gowda __

S/0. Kale Gowda V I  _«
Aged about 42 years ~ - fl  }  .A 
Working as Head Master  1  
Sahakari School, Housing Board
Holenarasipura .     
Hassan4_33'istr1et._V_ a 7

 'Radhad V   
W/o.'=K.G. Rangaswarny
Aged about 42'»-years'  "

'waking as..Asst. Mistress
 in ;MathematiC's -------- ~ "
_ 'Saha1:af'i._._Schoo1, Housing Board
3 "flolenarasipura
 Hassan D':sfn'ct

..MaV.nje_ Cowda

S./o;«._Deve Gowda
Aged about 42 years

AA ; «Working as PE Teacher

V'  ..Saha1/cari School, Housing Board

Holenarasipura



Hassan District

Raine Gowda
S/o. Kari Gowda
Aged about 36 years

Working as Asst. Master   -

in Science

Sahakari Schooi, Housing Board  ' 

Holenarasipura  _'
Hassan District '

D. Sundaresha 

S/o. Devaraje Gowda _
Aged about 30 years *  '
Working as S.D.A.

Sahakari School, Itlotisigg  A

Hoienaraisipeira _
Hassan..I3istric_tj =

Shivarama' 71.;

sxo. La}£KfliaH1:'3 

Aged .abo1,it' .39 jrears_ 'A '  __
Working as Ass t, Master,----

in Arts -   _ 
Sahakari Schoo1,A~Ho=a'sing Board
Holenarasipnra '

 'Hassan District -------- ~ *

" ~ sn1.:.'H_;c.' Bharathi
 
. 'Aged  34 years
'«...Wo_rking' as Asst. Mistress

in Social Studies
Saiiakari Sehooi, Housing Board

A I A" ljiolenarasipura
 Hassan District



(By Sri. M.S. Parthasarathi' &« If V
Sri. MP. Sfikanth',"«7:,A.dVSI)' g 

Sycd Munajir Adil. J
S/o. Syed J affer

Aged about 34 years
Working as Asst. Master
in Hindi

Sahakari School, Housing Board
Holenarasipura
Hassan District

B.P. Basavaraju

' S / o. Puttaiah

Aged about 39 years _ *
Working as Craft Teacher  
Sahakari School, Housing Board ._
Holenarasipura   A  
Hassan District

it §§.j. :PETITIONERS

The State or i{arriat'a.1:{a %
Primary'  Sccond'a.ry"Education

,,  8: ~ Building

a . - ...1:'n-.s,.AAmb3ec1kar' Veetihi
.  Bangalore,--- 560 001
 _ by its Secretary

' ' 'The Coinrnissioner for Public Instruction
New Public Offices

Nrtipathunga Road

 A. , c_'Bangaiore -- 560 001



3. The Director of Public instruction
New Public Offices
Nrupathunga Road
Bangalore -- 560 001

4. The Deputy Director of Public }.ns'tI--'uction it 
I-lassan District   I "
Hassan

5. ' The Block Educational Officer'
Holenarasipura Range  
Iiolenarasipura
Hassan District

6. Kritika Vidya Samasthe  :
Bydarahallilfl  H.
Ho1enarasvipu.ra* Taiukg -V 5
Hassan..distriAct_«." '  '    ,

Rep. bjrits-'Secretary-a'i'.'j«,   RESPONDENTS

[By Sri.  f§i~"R}1 to R6
Sri. Venk_atesh R.'  for R-6)

V-i.i'l'ha:'se writ petit1'ons are filed under Articles 226 and

A' ._ 2-A27'.,o1" uthe «Constitution of India praying to direct the
'r_es'pond_er1ts - I  5 to consider the representation dated

19 , 7'.  10  

"'««.TI'l1ese~1§'etitions coming on for Orders this day, the

'Court made the following-



ORDER

The petitioners are the teaching and non-teachiriif _

of Sahakari High School, Holenarasipura, :I3istric’.g_r

run by the 6th respondent. According toaathie l4peti.tione19s;.___th.e. at

school was admitted to the salair3r___grant..V_ It is that ;

the State Government has failedvl4l’togv’1’e_lease’the’salary grant
w.e.f. November 2009. l–iave.A representations
at Annexures-M and N ElSfF..20/xlivolf-requesting the
15: respondent November, 2009

and also to .01″ficer’*to’ manage the affairs of

the aforesaid– sch7o.C1.,_p l’Since”th_e’ said representations have not

been cons’id4e1*ed,”–th”eg’ petitioners have filed these writ

V petitions seeking tlgriellfollnowing reliefs:

” fjirect the respondents–1 to 5 to consider

flue”~.:repr’es_entation dated 19.7.2010 of the

if A with regard to continuing of payment
of salafi} grant-in-aid payable to the petitioners.

L _ bl” Direct the respondents to consider the

x _ rrepresentations preferred on 19.7.2010 vide

Ar1neXures–M and N seeking for appointment of

i

Special Officer to the Sahakari High School run
by the 6*” respondent management.

c) Pass any other order/s as this Hon’l:)le=”‘–V.’l’

Court deems fit to grant in the circumstaneesl ‘7’

the case. ”

2. I have heard learned CounseI__fo–re_the it

3. According to the..petitior’:eij’s, the school’~in”lquestion
was admitted to the salary l’gr.iar1t the order at
Annexure–A1 dated_._ V’ to the terms and
conditions’*-mentiolriegl. therein.’ “it~Visl their case that the 1st
respondent’ has tol”d_iVsb_urse salary to the petitioners

herein w.e;f…_4N0Vernbe.f_,” 2909. The representations were

filedwaeslvvper Annexu_res–M and N on 19.7.2010. The 151

resp~o_ndenthas<to consider the same expeditiously.

the result, the writ petitions succeed and are

llacicordinvgly allowed. The 13*» respondent is directed to

.lc3o-nsidjer the representations at Annexures–M and N both

fl_,,…..«.w.,,w_

E3

dated 19.07.2010 and pass appropriate orders

accordance wih law within a period of six weeks

date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Cs