Loading...
Responsive image

Bhawanisinh vs Iqbal on 6 September, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Bhawanisinh vs Iqbal on 6 September, 2010
Author: K.M.Thaker,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

AO/173/2010	 3/ 3	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

APPEAL
FROM ORDER No. 173 of 2010
 

 
=========================================================

 

BHAWANISINH
DADBHA VALA - Appellant(s)
 

Versus
 

IQBAL
IBRAHIM ERANDIYA - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
VIRAL
K SHAH for
Appellant(s) : 1, 
MR VH KANARA for Respondent(s) :
1, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 06/09/2010 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER

1. The
matter is being adjourned from time to time. Lastly, the appeal was
listed on 30.08.2010 when, at the request of Mr.Shah, learned
advocate for the appellant, it was adjourned to 1st
September, 2010. On 1st September, 2010, the appeal had to
be adjourned to 6th September, 2010. In view of the
request made by Mr. Shah, learned advocate that in all probability,
he is likely to retire from the proceedings as advocate for the
appellant.

3. Today,
Mr. Shah has informed that he has been instructed, by his client to
retire from the proceedings as appellant’s advocate and that
therefore, he has handed over the papers of the appeal to his client
i.e. the appellant.

4. The
appellant Mr.Bhawanisinh Dadbha Vala is present in the Court. He has
confirmed that he has asked advocate Mr. Shah to retire from the
proceedings.

5. Mr.

Vala, the appellant, who is present in the Court, has, on one hand,
requested for early hearing of the appeal and when the Court
suggested to schedule the hearing of the appeal tomorrow i.e.
07.09.2010 he requested for more time to instruct his advocate, who
is now to be engaged in place of Mr. Shah. He has requested for at
least two to three days’ time. Since there will be holidays on 10th,
11th and 12th and since this Court has also
the roster of writ petitions arising from the Civil Courts’ orders,
which are being taken up for hearing on Thursdays and Fridays. S.O.
to 13th September,
2010.(particularly
the appellant, in person, has asked for more time and not agreed for
hearing on 7th
September, 2010).

(K.M.

Thaker, J.)

rakesh/

   

Top

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More Information