' BETWEEN .. B_HIMANA'GO_UDA M A '$.10.NA!.=APPAG0flDA'!~!AC."RA;.Dl§£f - L "AGED-ABOUT 47 YEARS i k mo. -BANAHATfl,..-'mLUKA- % t '_.BI3r'\r""L3R'i-'I'p'wi 5363._12'€g_.L,V- 'V 'V ' GEE: AG%C'J!..'!'..!RE . ~. .. Pemzereea ifiy :1-'sri :ayak:umarT%%s. fiatfi, sr. f'" Srfit-S.-'__". %su.1.-%} AM: « R1o:MADABAL 1 THE 'A-SSIsTAN_'F.C0--. Mzsszouen mm % % ..f§HE1RETURNIN_G_0F.F"ICE_R_ 34;. L % %%%3s,; KAMNOLU; PANCHAYAT "CONST1'fi~.'!ENCY % L L % g13.qpurcp1s"rR:cT - 536 1o1:._ 2- *GIRISH:--.. k 1 % 3 : J sio.IARPasAHI=aTTcH1KK;-12 % "A E-D 235_YEA'_l'2§ '% ~ o.=.c::.-x-9..-=\-Ir.:u:_':*%-..--=-== T'i.'u'i< sin.-«nae: '-536 123' . . T ;: SIDDhfiAGOUi'5A-- -S/Q;uSl_7|f\[|KARAPPAGOUDA_T'BIRADARI AGED AaoUT;?.? TEARS * __ - OCC:_AGRICULTURE_ . ' R/o. KERUTAGI'V_ILlAGE- : % TALUKA SINDAGI DIST BIJAPUR - 586 128 4 AWANAGOUDA s/o. NILAKANTRAYAGOUDA AGED 32 YEARS occ: comnncroa Rm H.A.R.A!\!.A.L P s « TALUK SINDAGI - 586 128 5 BASANGOUDA c-In um I Aunt:-nu lf'\A nanny '3] 'J: I'II'"-I_rII'l'I\J\I\JI-'E"- 'v. AGED ABOUT 37 mans 6CC:i'\GR'iCu'i.'iURE I . R/o.MAoBALv1LALGE - I IALUK 5.|.NDAi.'1P5.V- 1153.' .2 .. msr a1JAeu2:s..2TI:2 2 - 5 MADIWALA'i'.%'A""""--V._ I ', ' 5/o. BAs.AwA;MA're-I '- & AGEfl"ABOU'l' ma. <sua5ewAo<»v1uxee, mm SINDAGI - 5352123 I DISTBISAAPUR, 7 SHANKKI-iAYVA.. I £3/0. *SIDDARa"""VV - "3 "'.\,l'I"Il I 'I I'Il"IllI 7_A"GE_D ABOUT 37"1*Ei\RS . « flfia i?lP'_'I'lI'I"'l II 11 II'): '. \aNru\.an~.f'|'-:-.3I'\-EXJLFI-I\JI'\Iu I R.(o.T miuiaob VILLAGE, I '-'__'i':'\i;'tii€«.$i'F-5DiaGI -- 536 vs H DIST anapun. _ I " 'nay sn Ramesh B. Anneppanavar, AGA for R1, 'A , a Sr! R.L. Patli, Advocate for C/R 2 and 3] THIS wan PETITION IS FILED umen ARTICLES 225 AND 227 I ETHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ~, C30MMU!\!IC.A'!IQN D12 '2fiJ-$2008 ISSUED BY R1 VIBE .A..fi!!'!EXiDa fALONGWITH THE WRIT PETITION; DIRECT THE RESPONDENT N0.1 T
I AIAIAIT TI-IF DFQI IIT GI: Tl-I33 Fl 1:!-“‘l”‘I'(‘iM ADDISLI Q DflIIl”I’llI!’2 llllflflflfl
nvvrui llll. I\I.uv:.| vu urn rlrr I-unis: uh!
III-I– I-5-I-\-ill W ITI-I’ VII\In-
‘i”i’ii:’ i_Efi\Rl’*I’El’5 l’5′”i\iCIPI”\i. Di§TRTfi 3UDGE, BHAFUP
1 A 2
APPEAL no. no or zoos AND NOT TO pnEc1p1TA’1:re~aw1′.-an;
AND ETC. . e
THIS PETITION comma on FoRPREuM1ivAIw7H:5AWtr1i9G
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWIN€.3: ‘
=—an-.-“‘j”c'”‘A’e. A%% v
Sri Rarnesh B. Anneppaithefiar, theiee:*nedRAdditionei
Government Advocate ,is..V_4’dlrected.f; to*.._take’VVnot’lce for the
respondent No.1.
2. Chaiieri§e::1iifi__.this Eftitiert. the communication,
dated 25* M.ereh,;.%%2oo%afth%r{Aeeexureéo) Issued by the first-
mspondent I%n1.%eempneece.w:t.h 3,-_h_–.3 order, dated 3rd March, zoos
passed bythe’ (Senior Division) and J.M.FIc.,
SIndhefgi’~ In Petition No.1 of 2007 connected with
.er%eaee..e I5éjt5t§han.1No.3″”‘of zooy. The con! Judge eppetnted the
Z for the purpesieof recounting the baiiot papers of Kannoiii Zllla
‘””.5i.”.f-.Panchaydt…AAtonstltuency, Buapur for which the elections were
fiend 23″‘ December, zoos. He has further directed the first
“j vtespondent Assistant Commissioner to complete the recounting
process on or before 15″‘ April 2008 and report the same to the
man
Court immediately thereafter. Acting on the sale’ direi:ti:ons–,__the
first respondent Assistant Commissioner has
April 2008) for holding the recountlng.»ss»rl»–..
3. Piieanwhiie the petitioner prefent’d to the
Court of the Principal District Judge. auapurslsmng ‘section
171(2) of the Karnataka ‘il§anch_a’)’ra_t The District
Judge has orderedemergent 2008 as the
date for the apflrearance of l
4. s_r_l__ learned senior counsel
appearing for -for’ the petitioner submits that
the statutory: appeal “”.:5iendi-rig’consideration before the District
Judge. is being renteredviinfructuous, as the recounting begins at
“‘~’ 5″” “-rii 2098 en… the sitt: g of the Cot.¢ s-..-+.—-. at
if’ ‘éiock”oi_:.,.Fi¥ew§ame day. He therefore prays f’r the stay of
V V’ . the commencement of the recounting process until the disposal
‘ H H 1’ the petitioner’s IA for stay In-the appeal.
‘5. Sri Ravindra L. Fatal, the learned coenset appearing for
1′ the caveator/respondents No.2 and 3 [election petitioners before
the court of the Civil Judge’: (Sr. Dn.)], submits that what is
tau
2
,t’nis page
challenged in these proceedings is only a consequentiejt-r.:o–.
The order passed by the Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.) iejifeneiieteeeeetlbyy
way of appeal before the District- Judges; ..|.-lye 4_it_is-._note.
permissible for the petitioner to cha!lVengfe’fVthe« ifndrderyin
one Court and the consequentistjtirder in someether’-wcofirt.
also brings to my notice that itself is
not disposed of. It has on’iyA’dirfi_’:tfedhtiiefgefsiftant Commissioner
to hold the reconrsting arid matter to Itself.
Sri Patil strenudesl%s9ntends.._thatlthe:V petitioner is not entitled
to any interirn”A”orde:r:;;pf tfhespgproceedlnos, as he has not
even flledany pending appeal. In support of
his subrn!ss!’e.n,! he’hesV.’eie§’*..»piaced the affidavit on the record of
teday.’ ”
6. :(3*rjj’tvhe4:c”a.refui consideration of the submissions made at
‘wauld l:u’-:-“I- secured b”
thehar, 151- the considered view that the ends of justice
“expressing any opinion on the merits of the case:
(a)
(“D3
The first respondent Assistant Commissiienfiri-4.ii,
shall commence the process of recc.-*1:i.:i+ivn’;Av;:i:: eh
5″‘ April, 2003;
However the outceme “oI_”r~the ,r”e_co:untingg.”‘d V’
Process shall not be declared wiugoutiuie am
of the Appelsipte. ‘VA(ith_e.it:ourt Principal
District Judge,V_V:’Buep_pr:v where the
eiect’ion;.e:i?sppe.els; of 2008 are
ThevVVi3’r’injciipei”‘District -‘Judge, euapur is directed
‘to_’1dispo*se”‘ofthe appeals as expeditiously
the petitioner and the respondents No.2
~~ ixflend 3 are directed to co-operate with the
disposai of the matter.
93.13.14
(e) Without waiting for any notice from the
the petitioner and the respondents N-o:.”2
and/or their advocates shat’!appepar?_:h’ei’tsrettvhe V
Court of the Principal DIstri_ct’:_Ju’doe;
11° algal: an 5″‘ Le-§tI;..V2nn§=.__ V . T’ ‘A V’ 2
7. The petition Is daspmsecjwdofl rmaorder as to costs.
8. §ri Rame:-in B. iearned Additionai
Government is ‘d!rected;-tocornfinunlcate the operative
portion ofp___toda:y’s:.;xiiordiejr ” fflrst respondent Assistant
Commissioner’ fovrtrnnltit ‘ ‘ ., ‘ 7
A_carbo’n.copfi’V–.of’~tod~ay’s order Is to be made over to Srl
sdl-_
Iudqe