Bhogilal vs Popatbhai on 21 December, 1882

Last Updated on August 11, 2017

JUDGMENT

Charles Sargent, Kt., C.J.

1. As the plaintiff has sought the relief contemplated by Section 265 of the Contract Act (IX of 1872) by suit, he must pay the ad-valorem, court fees stamp required by a suit for account’s under Section 7, el. iv (f) of Act VII of 1870.