Bhogilal vs Popatbhai on 21 December, 1882

Last Updated on

Bombay High Court
Bhogilal vs Popatbhai on 21 December, 1882
Equivalent citations: (1883) ILR 7 Bom 125
Author: K Charles Sargent
Bench: C Sargent, Kt., Kemball


Charles Sargent, Kt., C.J.

1. As the plaintiff has sought the relief contemplated by Section 265 of the Contract Act (IX of 1872) by suit, he must pay the ad-valorem, court fees stamp required by a suit for account’s under Section 7, el. iv (f) of Act VII of 1870.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *