IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CWJC No.16538 of 2010
BHOLA SAHNI
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
-----------
For the petitioner: Mr. Dipak Kumar,Advocate
Mr. Chakrapani,Advocate
For respondent Nos. 5 & 6: Mr. Pashupati Prasad Sinha, Advocate
For the State: Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, A.C. to S.C.6.
—–
2. 1.10.2010 Mr. Pashupati Prasad Sinha, Advocate
appears for respondent Nos. 5 and 6.
The grievance of the learned counsel for
the petitioner apart from those on merits is that
his M.J.C. No.2621/2010 for recall of the order
passed in C.W.J.C. No.8570/2010 was disposed of on
28.7.2010 with the direction that the three orders
passed in his favour by this Court shall also be
considered by the Director, Fisheries, if an
application is filed for intervention/being added
as party by him but his application was not
received. When the petitioner after obtaining the
certified copy of the order dated 28.7.2010
requested the respondent No.2, Director, Fisheries
to hear him, he was intimated that the argument in
the said case was already over and respondent No.2
had reserved his order, which was to be delivered
later on. Other allegations are also made against
the Director, Fisheries.
-2-
Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 5 and
6 seeks to assail the said allegations and prays
for one week’s time to file counter affidavit in
the matter.
Issue notice to respondent no.7.
Requisites, etc. both under ordinary process and
registered cover with A/D must be filed within one
week, failing which the application shall stand
rejected without further reference to a Bench.
Put up after service of notice before the
regular Bench hearing Group-III cases.
In the meantime status quo, as of today,
shall be maintained.
VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )