IN mg HIGH COURT 0;? 3:1' _ %
DATED THIS THE 29:» my OF QCj'CBER,_..2GG9 : " " ' « a
A
THE HONBLE MR.
fvm.No, j_ ----
BE'YWEE\§= _
BHOR IhTDUSI'_§iES igiwm) V
A CGMFANY 1NC£}1{1?{3RATEDv_{B.\5]3ER
THE fl\II§)IA§'~I4 CDMP;.£,NIES..ACT;' 1956,
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT) _ " " '
M.S.R.AMA1.m., 1:~eI3Us'rR3;A:;EsTAT§
BANGALORE 560'a%s4;' '
V. BY ..... .. V
$}?1V3$ri.'M5;RJ.JTH?.._
Ab"Ifi10R1:;:E;;_) §E?REsE1~«rrAzIVE
, ,PE'I'ITIONER
; {By 5;}; sefévpasiéfixaa mm s.N.MUR:{H¥ ASSTSR)
% f_ ' 'V F THE ADMINISTRATGR
BRUHAT' BANGALORE NIAHANAGARA PALIKE
" N.R.SQ_UARE
BANG_AL()REI 560 062
1
ww"
2. Ti-IE MEDICAL OFFICER (HEALTH)
BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKLE: _. .. f f ~ , V
SANIAYNAGAR DIVISXON
2ND FLOOR, YESHVVANTHPURCOMM£ERCLfi1.«A.fiv " " '
COMP];-EC, YESHWANTHPUR
BANGALGRESGG 022.
3. M13. IAXMI LIVESTGCK FEEDS _l§RZWA?E LT13 ~ . T.
A COMPANY mcoapomsrgn UNj::>ERL--. j' V % ._
TBEINII}IANCOMPANIES"ACfI',195<;., . " '
I~1AVfl\¥GI'§'SOFFI(3EA'F i
M.S.RAMAIAH 1N1msTR1AL'Es--:::a.TE
BANGALGRE5690a4._4.'*
RE?RESm\F{'ED'BY_ITS..';'. 'V ..j »
A{?1'HQRiSE1J'RfiPRE§?pfl'€'§;§*ff&'E V
CHIEF ., '
SRI.A.S.MURALIDHA_R¢§g._
4. 'Fi:LE--' As31s*f;m*1"' HJGLNEER
{ELE(Z{'RI{1AL) {C.O;«&_§;§_)___' _
- V' "'BES€;OMj5C-6 'SUB DIVISION
BA;~:.<:mLiA;{>__R, G€;)KUI,A HOUSE
~ 'saxvm,
B§$.NGALORE~566 054.
..RES?ONDfl'~3T'S
u {By Sri ASHOK HARANAILALLI IJOR R1 8: R2
Sri M.S.RAMBHAT 81 SRIPAB ASSTS FOR R3
Sri N.K.GUPTA E90}? R4
Sri SUNBARSWAMY RAMDAS AS813 EUR RS}
QLNN'
This writ petition filed under Articles 226
Constitiztien of India praying to quash the 0rder.V§ia'e£é,d ?['_1';6.'29{)7..i _& i
passed by the resprmdent 120.1. ;
This petiticm coming en for hé3rii2.g "{hisiid§y,. zine
made the foliowing;
«m»&*a
Petitioner lessee under
respondeni no.5. < between the
petitioner =z:;§i.5_, i*éiI_jeieVVp€iitioner is entitled to
According to {he petitianer,
they s_ub~¥etV..t,h€ V p1:emi_sés~-- question in favour of third
- V. Siriciéi ivthé' ivthirci respondent refused ta pay the
zni§I;tI’iI}«”v. 1ifiz’:::t;.vt2″s,§m,~v1;i}tior1er requested respondents 1 and 2 to cancei
the iiisenséiiriiiiifzivour esf third respondent and aiso requestcci the
.i”e1:;tl*; r$§onden: to disconneci the power supply to the premises
* iii’§<:i[ii.ziéjstiun. {finder the impugzed orders raspondents 1 and 2
ii ifzfiisecf to cancei the iicense in &vour of the thiré resmndent, so
3350 the fourth respondent refused £0 disconnect the power supply
{:3 the premises in question. Hence this petition.
,
2. During the penciency of th¥s writ p€ti[iOi?i;”‘{h§3~,_’§i3§.{(Zi
respondent vacated the premises in question and hanéxzé ‘£’)VTf:1«’Athf§t’
Vacant possession t0 the fifth respondent:-A’ §{.1rti’rer-.i_t'”‘ is’
dispute that fifth respondent haéi»T.<jis{1:1antied Vthe, zvfuich " V
was in occupeticm of third _respond'ent_'.'– §?'a;fther ieamefi counsei
for the petitioner submits theta civii' .-§L:.i_1:__iL§ §A::sti';uted against the
fifth reégondcntv ..cri"' possessian of the premism in
question. It1'..Yifi1V ef.tli'esed evelopments, the prayer in the Writ
" < _bec9tii'e'viz1.fructuous. The parties are bound by the
gleeigitgne-«f«Vti2e' rjixéil ceurt, which is now pending. Accordingly,
the "grit pezititgfm is hereby re§ected.
Séfm
SUDGE
DEB