Bhoruka vs Migweld on 29 September, 2011

  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

COMP/296/2000	 1/ 1	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

COMPANY
PETITION No. 296 of 2000
 

 
=========================================


 

BHORUKA
STEEL LTD. - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

MIGWELD
& MACHINES LTD. - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================
 
Appearance : 
M/S.VYAS
ASSOCIATES for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 
OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR for Respondent(s) :
1, 
=========================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 29/09/2011 

 

ORAL
ORDER

When
the petition is taken up for hearing, Mr. Vyas, learned Advocate for
the petitioner company is present. However, learned Advocate for the
respondent company is not present.

From
the record, it appears that at some stage of the proceedings it was
contended by the respondent company that proceedings before BIFR/AIFR
are pending. The Court, vide order dated 11.01.2010, directed the
respondent company to place on record the latest position regarding
status of the proceedings before the Board/Appellate Authority.
However, any details do not appear to have been placed on record.
Hence, S.O. to 19th December 2011.

(K.M.THAKER,
J.)

jani

Top