Gujarat High Court Case Information System
Print
CA/6697/2008 1/ 2 ORDER
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CIVIL
APPLICATION - FOR AMENDMENT No. 6697 of 2008
In
LETTERS
PATENT APPEAL No. 1157 of 2006
In
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5534 of 2006
======================================
BHIKHAJI
RAVAJI THAKOR-THR'PAHVINABEN
BHUPENDRABHAI
SHAH & 2 - Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE
OF GUJARAT THR' SECRETARY & 7 - Respondent(s)
======================================
Appearance :
MR YATIN OZA,
Sr. Counsel with MR BP GUPTA for Petitioner(s)
: 1, 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.3, 1.2.4, 1.3.1,1.3.2 - 2, 2.2.1,2.2.2 - 3,
3.2.1, 3.2.2,3.3.1 GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent(s) : 1,
None
for Respondent(s) : 2 - 3, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.2.5, 3.2.6,
3.2.7, 3.2.8, 3.2.9, 3.2.10,3.2.11 - 7.
- for Respondent(s) :
0.0.0
======================================
CORAM
:
HONOURABLE
THE CHIEF JUSTICE Y.R.MEENA
and
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE J.C.UPADHYAYA
Date
: 19/06/2008
ORAL
ORDER
Heard
learned Counsel Mr. Yatin Oza on the amendment application.
Considering
the submissions, he is permitted to implead Gujarat Housing Board,
Pragatinagar, Ahmedabad, through the Commissioner, as party
respondent No.9 and to substitute prayer clause 15(A) in the main
petition. He is directed to carry out these amendments by
incorporating the same in the main petition and submit fresh typed
memo of petition within two days.
The
main matter be listed on 25.6.2008, if the amendment is carried out
as directed.
Civil
Application for amendment stands allowed.
(Y.R.
Meena, C.J.)
(J.C.
Upadhyaya, J.)
*/Mohandas
Date:23.6.2008
After
signing of the order, Mr. Yatin Oza states that something had
remained omitted in the order. According to Mr. Oza, there was
direction that if the amendment is carried out, issue notice to the
newly added respondent and direct service was also permitted.
Considering
the above, issue notice to the newly added respondent No.9,
returnable by 25.6.2008. Direct service permitted.
List
it on 25.6.2008.
(Y.R.
Meena, C.J.)
(J.C.
Upadhyaya, J.)
Top