High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Bijay Kumar Chaudhary &Amp; Ors vs State Of Bihar &Amp; Anr on 29 July, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Bijay Kumar Chaudhary &Amp; Ors vs State Of Bihar &Amp; Anr on 29 July, 2010
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                           Cr.Misc. No.40147 of 2004

            1.BIJAY KUMAR CHAUDHARY, S/O Late U.N. Chaudhary
            2.VIKKI CHAUDHARY, S/O Bijay Kr. Chaudhary
            3.SMT. SUSHAMA CHAUDHARY, W/O Bijay Kr. Chaudhary
            All Resident of Village Navatolia, P.S. Bihpur(Bhawanipur) Distt.Bhagalpur.
                                                                 ............Petitioners.

                                          Versus

            1.THE STATE OF BIHAR
            2.MRITYUNJAY KR. CHAUDHARY, S/O Late Upendra Narayan Chaudhary,
            Resident of Village Navatolia, P.S. Bihpur(Bhawanipur), Distt Bhagalpur.
                                                                ........Opposite Parties.

            For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv.
            For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Mr. Rajeeve Ranjan Singh,Adv.
            For the State      : Mr. Murli Dhar, A.P.P.
                                                 -----------

04. 29.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, opposite party

no. 2 and Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been

filed seeking quashing of order dated 15.10.2004 passed by Additional

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Naugachia taking cognizance for the

offence under Sections 323, 448, 504, 379 of the Indian Penal Code

against all the six named accused persons in Complaint Case No. 134

of 2004, filed by Opposite Party No. 2.

The three petitioners here are also named accused

persons out of the six named in the complaint. After some arguments

the learned counsels representing the parties arrived at this agreement

that there is some material against petitioner no. 1 Bijay Kumar

Chaudhary. In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the

petitioners with extent to the petitioner no. 1 Bijay Kumar Chaudhary,

seeks permission to withdraw this application, at the same time
2

learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 also favorably conceded that

there is no material to proceed against rest of the petitioners, Vikki

Chaudhary and mother Smt. Sushama Chaudhary, so the impugned

order may be quashed with respect to them in view of the agreement

entered into between the members of Bar.

Considering the factual and legal aspect without further

adjudication on merit, this application with respect to petitioner no. 1

i.e. Bijay Kumar Chaudhary stands dismissed as withdrawn, but with

respect to petitioner no. 2 and 3 i.e. Vikki Chaudhary and Smt.

Sushama Chaudhary stands allowed, impugned order to their extent is

quashed.

Praveen                                                ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)