IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 490 of 2007
1. Bijay Rana
2. Bandhani Devi
3. Reshmi Devi
4. Shyam Rana
5. Bhunshwar Rana ... ... ... Appellants
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opp. Party
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY
For the Appellants : Mr. Anjani Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the State : Mr. S.N. Rajgarhia , A.P.P.
08/08.03.2011
I.A. No. 257 of 2011
Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for
the State.
Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the
prosecution witnesses have not supported the prosecution case. He has further
submitted that the father and mother of the victim have not stated anything in
support of the prosecution case. He has further contended that the appellants are
in custody for about three years and eleven months.
Learned counsel for the State Mr. S.N. Rajgarhia has pointed out
that earlier the prayer for bail of the appellants was thrice rejected by different
Benches of this Court. He has further submitted that the doctor P.W.8 has very
specifically stated that the skull was full of clotted blood and brain lacerated and
fractured of parietal bone left side. These injuries were caused by hard and blunt
substance and antemortem in nature.
Considering the submissions and materials on record, I am not
inclined to grant bail to the appellants.
Accordingly, I.A. No. 257 of 2011 is rejected.
(Jaya Roy, J.)
Anit