High Court Kerala High Court

Biju.C.John vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 24 August, 2009

Kerala High Court
Biju.C.John vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 24 August, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 23570 of 2009(M)


1. BIJU.C.JOHN, AGED 29 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RANNY,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE C.I.OF POLICE, RANNY,

3. THE DEPUTY SUPDT. OF POLICE

4. THE DISTRICT SUPDT. OF POLICE

5. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

6. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY

7. MUKUNDAN, VIJAYA VILASAM,

8. SHYJU S/O. KAMALASANAN,

9. ABHIJITH, S/O. ANANDAN,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH
The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR

 Dated :24/08/2009

 O R D E R
             KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.
                   ---------------------------------------------
                       W.P.(C) NO. 23570 OF 2009
                   ---------------------------------------------
                  Dated this the 25th day of August, 2009


                                 JUDGMENT

Kurian Joseph, J.

The Writ Petition is filed mainly with the following prayer:

“issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate
writ, order or direction commanding
respondents 1 to 6 to give necessary and
adequate police protection to the petitioner,
management staff, workers, T.S. No.3 covered
by Ext.P1 licence, customers, the vehicles
coming to the toddy shop bringing toddy etc, as
per the request in Ext.P2 forthwith.”

2. In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondents 7 to 9, it is

stated that the area where the petitioner is licensed to conduct the toddy

shop is a thickly populated area and the general public have been using the

same as a bus stop and waiting shed.

3. These are all matters for the party respondents and the public to

bring to the notice of the licensing authority in which case, at least while

W.P.(C)NO. 23570/2009 2

renewing the licence, such grievances can be looked into. So long as the

petitioner is conducting a licensed toddy shop, there cannot be any

unlawful obstruction on the part of the party respondents. In law, their

entitlement is only to conduct a peaceful demonstration. But, such

demonstration or agitation shall not interfere with the conduct of the

toddy shop, so long as it is in a licensed premise. In the event of any

unlawful obstruction, the first respondent shall render necessary protection

to the petitioner.

The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

(KURIAN JOSEPH)
JUDGE

(C.T. RAVIKUMAR)
JUDGE

sp/

W.P.(C)NO. 23570/2009 3

KURIAN JOSEPH
&
C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.

W.P.(C)NO.23570/2009

JUDGMENT

25th August, 2009