High Court Kerala High Court

Biju vs State Of Kerala on 7 June, 2007

Kerala High Court
Biju vs State Of Kerala on 7 June, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 1841 of 2007()



1. BIJU
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.V.GEORGE(PUTHIYIDAM)

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :07/06/2007

 O R D E R
                                 R. BASANT, J.

                        - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

                        Crl.M.C.No.  1841 of   2007

                        - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

                    Dated this the 7th day of   June, 2007


                                     O R D E R

The petitioner is the second accused in a prosecution under

Section 379 r/w. 34 I.P.C. He remains in custody from 26.5.2007.

His application for bail was allowed by the learned Sessions Judge as

per Annex.A order subject to conditions. It was directed that he must

execute a bond for Rs.15,000/- with two solvent sureties, of which

one shall produce a solvency certificate. The petitioner claims to be

aggrieved by this condition in Annex.A order.

2. To save time, the petitioner appeared before the learned

Magistrate and offered that one surety shall deposit the amount of

Rs.15,000/- so that the said condition of production of solvency

certificate may be dispensed with. The learned Magistrate, by the

impugned order, a copy of which is produced as Annex.B, took the

view that in view of the specific directions of the Sessions Court, the

Magistrate cannot accept the deposit in lieu of the solvency

certificate.

Crl.M.C.No. 1841 of 2007

2

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Annex.A or B

or both may be set aside and there may be a direction to the learned

Magistrate to receive the amount of Rs.15,000/- which one of the sureties

has offered to deposit and dispense with the condition of production of

solvency certificate by him.

4. I reckon the request by the learned counsel for the petitioner as

most reasonable and genuine. Obviously the learned Sessions Judge has

imposed the condition that one of the sureties must produce solvency

certificate to be doubly assured that at least one of them is solvent. If that

person offers to deposit Rs.15,000/- there can be no rhyme, reason or logic

in insisting that he must produce the solvency certificate itself.

5. Be that as it may, I am satisfied that interests of justice will be

served eminently by directing that if one of the sureties deposits an amount

of Rs.15,000- it shall be reckoned as equal or better than his production of

solvency certificate and the learned Magistrate shall permit the surety to

execute the bond.

6. This Crl.M.C. is accordingly allowed. The above directions are

issued.

Crl.M.C.No. 1841 of 2007

3

7. Hand over copy of the order to the learned counsel for the

petitioner forthwith as the petitioner is found to be in custody from

26.5.2007.

(R. BASANT)

Judge

tm