IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No.M-23904 of 2009
Date of decision : 4.11.2009
Bikramjit Singh Grewal and others ....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another ...Respondents
****
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND
Present: Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. B.B.S.Teji, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab
Ms. Anita Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.2.
S. D. ANAND, J.
The parties to the impugned prosecution i.e. petitioners and
respondent no.2 have compounded the offences and have placed on
record documented compromise, which may be read as Annexure P-1.
Petitioners and respondent no.2 are present in the Court and are identified
by their respective counsel. They own up the compounding. They further
state that presently there is no dispute subsisting between them. Their
joint statements has also been recorded separately.
In the larger interest of the society and to enable the parties to
maintain cordial relations, the petition shall stand allowed and FIR No.203
dated 11.10.2001 under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC registered at Police
Station, Sarabha Nagar, Ludhiana (Annexure P-1) shall stand quashed
qua the petitioners on account of compounding.
Disposed of accordingly.
November 04, 2008 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE