High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Bimal Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 27 April, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Bimal Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 27 April, 2011
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Cr.Misc. No.8456 of 2011
                      BIMAL SINGH, SON OF LATE SONELAL SINGH
                                          Versus
                               THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                        -----------

2. 27.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated

23.7.2010 in Cr. Misc. 24869 of 2010 since three fire arms were

recovered from his possession but it was stated that it was

being rejected at this stage. The petitioner is in custody since

18.4.2010.

Considering the same, let the petitioner above

named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to

the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, in

Sadar P.S. Case No. 126 of 2010 (G.R. No. 868 of 2010)

subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will

be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit

giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and

the other shall be the wife of the petitioner. The bailor will

undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change

in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on

affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner

is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release

in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at
2

liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the

ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking

that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be

present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two

given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be

liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv)That the

petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to

do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled.

( Anjana Prakash, J.)
S.Ali