Bimalkumar vs Manjulaben on 15 April, 2010

0
100
Gujarat High Court
Bimalkumar vs Manjulaben on 15 April, 2010
Author: Ravi R.Tripathi,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/3977/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 3977 of 2010
 

 
=====================================
 

BIMALKUMAR
CHANDRAKANT PATEL - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

MANJULABEN
WD/O CHANDRAKANTBHAI BABUBHAI PATEL & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

===================================== 
Appearance
: 
MR ATIT THAKOR for MR PARTHIV A
BHATT for Petitioner(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) : 1 -
2. 
=====================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI
		
	

 

Date
: 15/04/2010 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER

1.0 Heard
learned Advocate Mr. Atit Thakor for Mr. Parthiv Bhatt for the
petitioner. The petitioner original plaintiff appellant is
before this Court being aggrieved by an order passed by the learned
Principal Civil Judge, Dakor dated 27th February 2009
below application exh. 5 in Regular Civil Suit No. 26 of 2007,
whereby, exh. 5 application was rejected and interim order granted on
11th June 2007 was vacated. Against that, a Civil Misc.
Appeal No. 25 of 2009 was preferred before the learned 1st
Appellate Judge, who too, dismissed that appeal by judgment and order
dated 4th February 2010.

2.0 The
learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner
original plaintiff is residing in the property in question since long
and it is his case that this property came to his share by an oral
partition between he and his brother. He submitted that his father
expired in the year 1993 and his brother got appointment in S.T.
Corporation as a compensate appointment. He further submitted that
his brother is residing at Nadiad with his mother and it is only he,
who is residing in the property in question and is doing petty labour
work. He does not have another shelter and if the interim relief, as
prayed for, is not granted, his family will be without shelter.

3.0 Rule
returnable on 5th May 2010. In the
meantime, Ad-interim relief in terms of Para 11(B).
Direct service is permitted.

[
Ravi R. Tripathi, J. ]

hiren

   

Top

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *