IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.37444 of 2010
BINOD KUMAR
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
02. 08.10.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner, Binod Kumar is in custody since
09.08.2010 in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case
No. 271 of 2010 under Section 392 of the Indian Penal
Code.
According to the F.I.R., while the informant
and his wife after withdrawing Rs.2 Lakhs were going
towards registry office, two persons came on motorcycle
and snatched the bag containing the money and the
mobile and fled away.
The learned counsel for the petitioner
submitted that the theft mobile was found in possession
of one Makhan Kumar of Agra and by that mobile, he was
talking with the brother of this petitioner namely Ram
Kumar. The police on the basis of that, reached the
house of the petitioner and arrested this petitioner. The
learned counsel further submitted that except this
circumstantial evidence, there is nothing against the
petitioner and the petitioner has got no criminal
antecedents.
On the other hand, the learned A.P.P. objected
2
the prayer for bail.
It appears that although the petitioner is in
custody since 9.8.2010. No T.I. Parade has been held
and still today, nothing has been recovered from the
possession of the petitioner.
Considering the above facts and circumstances,
I direct that the petitioner named above to be released
on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000(Rs. Ten
Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to
the satisfaction of the Court of learned Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Patna in Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 271 of
2010.
( Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)
Saurabh