High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Birendra Kumar Verma vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 7 September, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Birendra Kumar Verma vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 7 September, 2010
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CWJC No.9771 of 2009
                   BIRENDRA KUMAR VERMA, S/O LATE PARMESHWAR
                   DAYAL, R/O VILLAGE-MORARPUR, P.S.-LAHERI,
                   DISTRICT-NALANDA.          .....................PETITIONER.
                                      Versus
                   1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL
                   SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
                   DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA.
                   2. COMMISSIONER, PATNA DIVISION, PATNA.
                   3. DISTRICT EDUCATION ESTABLISHMENT
                   COMMITTEE, NALANDA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY-CUM-
                   DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION,
                   NALANDA.
                   4. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT
                   EDUCATION ESTABLISHMENT COMMITTEE, NALANDA.
                   5. DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, NALANDA.
                   6. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, NALANDA.
                   7. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION,
                   NALANDA.
                   8. AREA EDUCATION OFFICER, ASTHAWAN, NALANDA.
                   9. AREA EDUCATION OFFICER, HILSA, NALANDA.
                                              ..................RESPONDENTS.
                                 -----------

4 07.09.2010 When the case was taken up by this Court on

28.08.2009 i.e. almost a year back, this Court noticed

that while allowing the appeal of the petitioner the

Appellate Authority has remitted the matter back to the

disciplinary authority for passing fresh orders within a

period of six months.

The grievance of the petitioner was that

inspite of the said remand order of the Appellate

Authority dated 30.03.2007, the disciplinary authority

had not passed the order till now. This Court, therefore,

allowed time to learned counsel for the respondents to

file a counter affidavit on behalf of the Deputy

Development Commissioner, Nalanda respondent no.5
2

assigning reason for pendency of the proceeding before

him for such a long time. It is almost one year, but no

counter affidavit has been filed.

Learned counsel for the respondents prays for

another adjournment.

The prayer is refused.

Since there is nothing on record to show that

the disciplinary authority has passed orders even after

passage of more than two years from the order of the

Appellate Authority dated 30.03.2007, by which, it was

directed to pass a speaking/reasoned order in the

proceeding within six months, it is directed that if till

today no final orders have been passed in the

proceeding by the disciplinary authority upon remand

from the Appellate Authority, the entire proceeding

against the petitioner shall stand quashed. As a

consequence, the punishment order shall stand wiped

out and the petitioner shall be entitled to all the

consequential benefits.

The writ application is allowed with the

aforesaid observations and directions.

Arvind/                         ( J. N. Singh, J.)