Bishwanath Panjiyara &Amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Anr on 22 November, 2010

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

                             Cr.Misc. No.17238 of 2009

                   1. BISHWANATH PANJIYARA
                   2. SATNARAYAN PANJIYARA
                         BOTH S/O LATE RAMDHANI PANJIYARA.
                   3. BHAIRAV PANJIYARA
                   4. HUBESHWAR PANJIYARA
                         BOTH S/O LATE MITHU PANJIYARA
                   5. SANJAY PANJIYARA S/O HUBESHWAR PANJIYARA
                   6. PRADEEP PANJIYARA S/O RABINDRA PANJIYARA.
                   7. LALJEET PANJIYARA S/O AKLU PANJIYARA.
                   8. BIJAY PANJIYARA S/O BHAIRAV PANJIYARA.
                   9. RAHINDRA PANJIYARA S/O LATE RAMDHANI
                      PANJIYARA
                   10.ARJUN PANJIYARA S/O LATE RAMDHANI PANJIYARA
                   11.RAJESH PANJIYARA S/O BISHWANATH PANJIYARA
                          ALL R/O VILLAGE DOMARANI, P.S. KATORIYA,
                          DISTRICT-BANKA.
                                                   --PETITIONERS
                                     Versus

                     1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
                     2. GOVIND PANJIYARA S/O BUTU PANJIYARA,
                        R/O VILLAGE-DOMSARANI, P.S. KATORIYA,
                        DISTRICT-BANKA.
                                                    --OPP.PARTY

                        For the Petitioner        : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha

                        For the State              : Mr. Amarendra Prasad,



2   22.11.2010

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

This application is for quashing of order dated

25-10-2010 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka,

in Katoriya P.S. Case no. 131 of 2008.

After some arguments learned counsel for the

petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with
2

liberty to agitate all his points before the trial court at

appropriate stage preferably at the time of hearing on the

point of charge , if the trial is yet to commence.

Permission is granted.

This application is, accordingly, disposed of

with the above liberty.

(Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

AAhmad