Brajendra Kumar Sinha & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 5 August, 2011

                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.1726 of 2007
                    1. Brajendra Kumar Sinha, son of late Girish Chandra
                       Prasad Sinha at present residing at Swarn Smriti,
                       Vijaynagar, Rukanpura, Bailey Road, West of Patel
                       Chowk, P.S. Danapur, District Patna
                    2. Umesh Prasad Srivastava, son of late Radha Krishna
                       Prasad, resident of village Belsand, P.S. Barauli, District
                       Gopalganj
                    3. Anil Kumar, son of late Paras Nath Sharma, resident of
                       village Dosut, P.S. Warshaliganj, District Nawada
                    4. Ashok Kumar Jha, son of Sri Upendra Jha, resident of
                       village Dariyapur, P.S. Shahkund, District Bhagalpur
                    5. Bhola Singh, son of late Ram Swaroop Singh, resident
                       of village Panchmahala, P.S. Mokamah, District Patna
                                                        ...         ... Petitioners
                                             Versus
                    1. The State Of Bihar
                    2. Agriculture Production Commissioner, Government of
                       Bihar, Patna
                    3. Director Agriculture, Bihar, Patna
                    4. Joint Director of Agriculture-cum- Controller, Weights
                       & Measures, Bihar, Patna
                    5. Deputy Director of Agriculture-cum- Joint Controller,
                       Weights & Measures, Patna Division, Patna
                    6. Deputy Director of Agriculture-cum- Joint Controller,
                       Weights & Measures, Bhagalpur Division, Bhagalpur
                    7. Assistant Controller, Weights & Measurres, Begusarai
                    8. Assistant Controller, Weights & Measures, Nawada
                                                .....         .... Respondents
02/   05.08.2011

Counsel for the petitioners states that during the

pendency of the writ petition, grievance of the petitioners

has been redressed.

In the circumstances, prayer made in the writ

petition has become infructuous, which is, accordingly,

disposed of.

       Arjun/                                         ( V. N. Sinha, J.)
 2