IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc No. M-14624 of 2008
Date of decision: 13.01.2009
Brijinder Dhawan and Others
....Petitioners
V/s
State of Punjab
....Respondent.
BEFORE : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Gurcharan Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG Punjab.
Mr. N.G. Sharma, Advocate for the complainant.
RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that allegations
contained in the FIR are very vague and general in nature. He further
submits that the matter was earlier enquired into in F.C. No. 229/2006 and it
was decided not to take any action. However, learned counsel for the State
contends that allegations in the earlier cases were different from those in the
present FIR.
Learned counsel for the State further submits that pursuant to
the order dated 29.08.2008 and subsequent order dated 10.11.2008
petitioners have already joined the investigation. Counsel for the State on
instructions from Inspector, Birbal Dass, who is present in the court, states
that petitioners are not required any longer for custodial interrogation.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, order whereby ad-
interim bail was granted, is made absolute.
13.01.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE