High Court Kerala High Court

Brilliant Das vs Union Bank Of India on 21 August, 2008

Kerala High Court
Brilliant Das vs Union Bank Of India on 21 August, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 25209 of 2008(A)


1. BRILLIANT DAS, S/O. HRIDAYA DAS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. UNION BANK OF INDIA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. REGIONAL MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.V.SABU

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

 Dated :21/08/2008

 O R D E R
                  M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.

                    -------------------------------

                    W.P.(C) No.25209 of 2008

                    -------------------------------

                 Dated this the 21st August, 2008.

                          J U D G M E N T

This petition is filed under Article 227 of the

Constitution of India, to quash Ext.P7 sale proclamation issued

by Sub Court, Ernakulam, in E.P.No.211 of 2004 in O.S.No.353

of 1998. Petitioner had earlier approached this Court by filing

W.P.(C) No.4698 of 2008 challenging the proclamation issued by

the executing court. Under Ext.P1 judgment, dated 8.2.2008,

this Court directed executing court not to proceed with the sale,

granting three weeks time to the petitioner to arrive at a

settlement with first respondent, decree holder, Bank. Under

Ext.P2, on the request of the petitioner, decree holder Bank

directed the petitioner to deposit Rs.4 lakhs latest by 28.5.2008,

so as to settle the dispute. Petitioner did not deposit that amount

and instead evidenced by Ext.P5, deposited Rupees One Lakh on

30.5.2008.

W.P.(C) No.25209 of 2008

2

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and

standing counsel who took notice for respondent decree holder

were heard.

3. The argument of the learned counsel appearing

for petitioner is that he is prepared to pay the balance amount of

Rs.3 lakhs as directed in Ext.P2, and is also prepared to pay the

entire decree debt within two months from today.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the first

respondent opposed the prayer contending that petitioner was

given sufficient time for payment and as per letter dated,

20.5.2008, petitioner had undertaken to pay the entire decree

debt within 90 days from 30.5.2008. In the circumstances, I do

not find any reason to grant three months’s time as sought for by

the petitioner.

The writ petition is disposed directing the

executing court to adjourn the sale to 3.9.2008, if the petitioner

W.P.(C) No.25209 of 2008

3

files an affidavit before the executing court agreeing to pay the

entire decree debt and waiving fresh sale proclamation on or

before 25.8.2008.

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,
JUDGE

nj.