Budhaditya Chattopadhyay vs The Union Of India on 18 October, 2010

-1'.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 18"' DAY OF OCTOBER, _

BEFORE

THE HONBLE MR.JUS'I'ICE, S..A_BDUIINAI§EER  

WRIT PETITION Nos.32493--49.4 OF 

BETWEEN:

1.

_ .BANOAIIOI2Is.»: 560 01.0.

BUDHADITYA CHATFOPADHYAY 
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS  A  
S/O AVIJIT cIIATI'OF%.:~xDIIYA¥, "  " V
NO. 1032, 3RD FLOOR, I H'QIJ's}3, I MAIN' ,
IVIUNISWAMAPPA LAXOUT,   .. 
KAVALBYRASANDRA. II If NAGAR POST 
BANOAII-ORAVOA '56c:._03:.2 -I ' '  I '

D/OI'sIIV£:RAM;:IIIYAM;'- »
AGED.AEsOUIj 26 YEARS . _'
N'O.3?,8/'98; 2ND FLOOR,_12TH MAIN
BTII I3'L,OcI«:,_ D-R;RAJI_{U1V£AR ROAD
RAJAJINAGAR, 4 " .  .

... PETITIONERS

 (I33: S171 nJAY}I\IKUTv'IAVR s PATEL ASSOCIATES, ADVS.}

' 'l'IIE UIVION OF INDIA

"MI_NISTRY OF HEALTH AN D FAMILY WELFARE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, PMG SECTION

I NIRMANA BHAVAN, MOULANA AZAI) ROAD
* NEW DELHI W 110 011,

BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

THE MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA
AIWAN«E~GALIB MARG
KHOTALA ROAD.



NEW DELHI W I10 O02
BY ITS SECRETARY

3. ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
(EXAMINATION SECTION]
ANSARI NAGAR, NEW DELHI~_l10608
BY ITS REGISTRAR

EXAMINATION SECTION  . I  _ 
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIjEN_CES   
ANSARINAGAR,   " v ..

NEW DELHI~110 608

5. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF HEALTH SERVICES
MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND__E'AMIi)( WELFARE I
NIRMANA BHAVAN: MOULANA A::AD.ROAD 
NEW DELHI -- 110 0.11" 2  e " 

6. DR B R AMBEDKAR.MED.ICA_I, CO'I;I,EC§E--. 
KADUGONTIARAIIALLI  I  -- ~ I

BANGAI.ORE:,+ 56O'--05L-ifi    
BY      .  RESPONDENTS

{By SR: KA_IYAIxI.BASAVARA;, ASST. SOLICITOR GENERAL
' FOR Rl'&'R5q '  *

'SR: MUK_UL.I.G.UPTA;"ADv. FOR R3 & R4
SR: N..KHE_'1'1'Y, 'ADV. FOR R2
SR1 "K,_DIv{IRAJ"'KU1VIAR, ADV. FOR R6}

  PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226

AND 227 OF THE CONSTYTUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING To

1 » DECLARE THAT THE MBBS DEGREES AWARDED TO THE
  PETITIO'NVERSAVIE&f. THE RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH

SCI]_':1NC'£§S'-.AS, PER ANNEX--A12 AND BI RESPECTIVELY IS A

RE1C'OGNI.ZE'D='DEGREE IN TERMS OF' IMC ACT AND FUR'I'i~1ER
DE'CLA.RING«*" 'I'HAT THE PETITIONERS ARE ENTITLED TO
APPEARw_FOR EXAMINATIONS INCLUDING THE ENTRANCE

 E}{AE\/HNATIONS CONDUCTED BY RESPONDENTS NOS.3.4 AND 5

 *   THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
  HEARING 13* GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE
 V' FOLLOWING:



ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitione-rs’qseeiis

permission of this court to withdraw

with liberty to file fresh Writ

of action if need be.

2. The submission learned the

petitioners is p1aced~.__0n .~reCori_:1. “eA.._Writ”petitions are
dismissed as liberty to the

petitioners t.o’*fi1e- wifit ;3e.tition’s1f:1n the same Cause of

Sd/-4 *
…..