High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Budhan Mistry vs The State Of Bihar on 25 October, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Budhan Mistry vs The State Of Bihar on 25 October, 2011
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                          Criminal Miscellaneous No.29310 of 2011
                             Budhan Mistry son of Nathuni Mistry
                                              Versus
                                     The State Of Bihar
                                  ----------------------------------

For the petitioner : Mr. Umesh Prasad, Advocate.

For the State : Dr. Indiwar Kumari, A.P.P.

————————————

3. 25.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for

the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering that during investigation there was

material to suggest that the case was one under Section 304 of

the Indian Penal Code, let the petitioner above named, be

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any

other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the

satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, in connection

with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 72 of 2010, subject to the

following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close

relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving

genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The

bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any

change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit

shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any

other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii)

That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform
2

the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other

case of similar nature after his release in the present case and

thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the

proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv)

That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive

the police papers on the given date and be present on date

fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and

delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the petitioner will be

well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two

consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

( Anjana Prakash, J.)
S.Ali