High Court Kerala High Court

Bushara vs The Kerala Public Service … on 31 July, 2008

Kerala High Court
Bushara vs The Kerala Public Service … on 31 July, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WA.No. 1576 of 2008()


1. BUSHARA,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. JAYANTHI KUMAR.P.

                        Vs



1. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SECRETARY

3. THE STATE OF KERALA

4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION

5. THE DISTRICT OFFICER

6. RARI RAGHAV R.K.M.,PUNCHIRI NILAYAM

                For Petitioner  :DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice J.B.KOSHY
The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.K.MOHANAN

 Dated :31/07/2008

 O R D E R
                       J.B.KOSHY & V.K.MOHANAN, JJ.
                             --------------------------------------
                               W.A.No.1576 OF 2008
                                             and
                            C.M.Appl.No.696 OF 2008
                             -------------------------------------
                               Dated 31st July, 2008

                                      JUDGMENT

Koshy,J.

This writ appeal is filed with a delay condonation petition to

condone the delay of 266 days in filing the appeal. Petitioners are challenging

the rank list prepared by the Public Service Commission for appointment to the

post of HSA (English) in Kozhikode District. The Public Service Commission has

prepared the rank list with 106 candidates in the main list. At the time of

preparation of short list, only 38 vacancies were reported. The position in other

districts was different. Here, the rank list was exhausted years ago and fresh

notification was also issued. The appeal was filed by the petitioners 2 and 3.

The reason stated for the delay is that he first petitioner Smt. Rari Raghav went

abroad. That is not a ground for condoning the delay. In any event, the reason

stated for condoning the long delay is not satisfactory. Hence, the delay

condonation petition is dismissed. Consequently, the appeal is also dismissed.

J.B.KOSHY
JUDGE

V.K.MOHANAN
JUDGE

tks